libddwaf v2

[Anilm3]

This PR tracks the current progress for the v2-alpha release, all changes will be independently reviewed before merging them to this branch.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.68007% with 205 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.90%. Comparing base (9c9d74e) to head (6f1e0d9).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/interface.cpp	61.08%	46 Missing and 40 partials ⚠️
src/object_view.hpp	75.71%	5 Missing and 29 partials ⚠️
src/object.hpp	86.20%	6 Missing and 14 partials ⚠️
src/ruleset_info.hpp	52.38%	1 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
src/iterator.cpp	93.33%	0 Missing and 8 partials ⚠️
src/processor/base.hpp	45.45%	0 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
src/iterator.hpp	77.27%	1 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/condition/cmdi_detector.cpp	85.18%	0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
src/event.cpp	95.65%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
src/matcher/base.hpp	81.25%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 14 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #377      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.08%   84.90%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         164      166       +2     
  Lines        8274     8425     +151     
  Branches     3627     3595      -32     
==========================================
+ Hits         7040     7153     +113     
- Misses        471      495      +24     
- Partials      763      777      +14     

Flag	Coverage Δ
waf_test	84.90% <81.68%> (-0.19%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks clang

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-20 17:01:12

Comparing candidate commit 6f1e0d9 in PR branch anilm3/v2 with baseline commit 9c9d74e in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks gcc

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-20 17:03:16

Comparing candidate commit 6f1e0d9 in PR branch anilm3/v2 with baseline commit 9c9d74e in branch master.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 0 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:global-benchmark.random.gcc

• 🟩 execution_time [-11.214ms; -11.177ms] or [-3.925%; -3.912%]

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks clang-pgo

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-20 17:15:56

Comparing candidate commit 6f1e0d9 in PR branch anilm3/v2 with baseline commit 9c9d74e in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.