Skip to content

Conversation

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

@bedroge bedroge commented Nov 24, 2025

When we build for a version with a suffix (e.g. 2025.06-001), the tarball step should actually check the directory name with the suffix in the overlay's upper dir. Note that it already sources eessi_defaults on line 293, this should set $EESSI_SOFTWARE_LAYER_VERSION_SUFFIX.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Nov 24, 2025

Let's make sure that it doesn't break anything for regular builds.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/intel/haswell

@eessi-bot-aws
Copy link

eessi-bot-aws bot commented Nov 24, 2025

New job on instance eessi-bot-mc-aws for repository eessi.io-2023.06-software
Building on: intel-haswell
Building for: x86_64/intel/haswell
Job dir: /project/def-users/SHARED/jobs/2025.11/pr_135/107427

date job status comment
Nov 24 09:07:46 UTC 2025 submitted job id 107427 awaits release by job manager
Nov 24 09:08:39 UTC 2025 released job awaits launch by Slurm scheduler
Nov 24 09:13:48 UTC 2025 running job 107427 is running
Nov 24 09:17:37 UTC 2025 finished
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-107427.out
✅ no message matching FATAL:
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching FAILED:
✅ no message matching required modules missing:
✅ found message(s) matching No missing installations
✅ found message matching .tar.* created!
Artefacts
eessi-2023.06-software-linux-x86_64-intel-haswell-17639756460.tar.zstsize: 0 MiB (73131 bytes)
entries: 78
modules under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell/modules/all
cowsay/3.04.lua
software under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell/software
cowsay/3.04
reprod directories under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell/reprod
no reprod directories in tarball
other under 2023.06/software/linux/x86_64/intel/haswell
no other files in tarball
Nov 24 09:17:37 UTC 2025 test result
😁 SUCCESS (click triangle for details)
ReFrame Summary
[ OK ] ( 1/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/29Aug2024-foss-2023b-kokkos %scale=1_node /aeb2d9df @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: perf: 439.979 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 2/10) EESSI_LAMMPS_lj %device_type=cpu %module_name=LAMMPS/2Aug2023_update2-foss-2023a-kokkos %scale=1_node /04ff9ece @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: perf: 472.541 timesteps/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 3/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /775175bf @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 3.03 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 4/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_allreduce %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /52707c40 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 3.12 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 5/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /b1aacda9 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 7.85 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 6/10) EESSI_OSU_coll %benchmark_info=mpi.collective.osu_alltoall %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node %device_type=cpu /c6bad193 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 5.75 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 7/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /15cad6c4 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 0.61 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 8/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_latency %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /6672deda @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: latency: 0.73 us (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] ( 9/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.2-gompi-2023b %scale=1_node /2a9a47b1 @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: bandwidth: 10699.09 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ OK ] (10/10) EESSI_OSU_pt2pt_CPU %benchmark_info=mpi.pt2pt.osu_bw %module_name=OSU-Micro-Benchmarks/7.1-1-gompi-2023a %scale=1_node /1b24ab8e @BotBuildTests:x86_64_intel_haswell+default
P: bandwidth: 10738.35 MB/s (r:0, l:None, u:None)
[ PASSED ] Ran 10/10 test case(s) from 10 check(s) (0 failure(s), 0 skipped, 0 aborted)
Details
✅ job output file slurm-107427.out
✅ no message matching ERROR:
✅ no message matching [\s*FAILED\s*].*Ran .* test case

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Nov 24, 2025

That worked, so let's do the final builds.

bot: build repo:eessi.io-2023.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/intel/haswell
bot: build repo:eessi.io-2025.06-software instance:eessi-bot-mc-aws for:arch=x86_64/intel/haswell

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor Author

bedroge commented Nov 24, 2025

Actually, this doesn't require a build+deploy, so I've cancelled the build jobs.

@EESSI EESSI deleted a comment from eessi-bot-aws bot Nov 24, 2025
@EESSI EESSI deleted a comment from eessi-bot-aws bot Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant