Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Some first numbers for Poco: vs. crowcpp: So it appears that the throughput of Poco is actually higher. But the number of responses is higher in crow? Still needs to be investigated |
Contributor
|
This is a preview of the changelog of the next release. If this branch is not up-to-date with the current main branch, the changelog may not be accurate. Rebase your branch on the main branch to get the most accurate changelog. Note that this might contain changes that are on main, but not yet released. Changelog: 0.5.5 (2025-02-26)Features
Bug Fixes
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
We had multiple issues with our Poco library in the past. In general, the library tries to do too much.
Explicit issues were:
Crowcpp is a leaner library for an http server.
PR Checklist