Merged
Conversation
TarLaboratories
added
ignore changelog
Member
|
idk if we should care about test coverage tbh |
Contributor
|
i really dont think this is neccesarry |
Contributor
|
I'm fine with this existing as a fun one-off thing, as long as we don't put any weight on it I'm okay having it in |
jurrejelle
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2026
Contributor
jurrejelle
left a comment
jurrejelle
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's not any weight to it and it can be useful when you test a new function you wrote which lines you have or missed. It's a tool not a target so it's fine imo
Pumpkin7266
added a commit
to Pumpkin7266/GregTech-Modern
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2026
This reverts commit 781f171.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds the
jacocoTestReportgradle task to generate an HTML page with a code coverage reportOutcome
We get this cool page :)
