Fix wrong argument check for 'redstone set #' placeholder#4595
Merged
jurrejelle merged 1 commit intoGregTechCEu:1.20.1from Feb 10, 2026
Merged
Fix wrong argument check for 'redstone set #' placeholder#4595jurrejelle merged 1 commit intoGregTechCEu:1.20.1from
jurrejelle merged 1 commit intoGregTechCEu:1.20.1from
Conversation
Changes argument check to allow 'redstone set' to work
jurrejelle
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
jurrejelle
added
type: bugfix
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes argument check to allow 'redstone set' to work
What
'redstone set #' placeholder does not work; issue is due to checking second argument for 'set' when it should be used for power in line 298 (reference line 292 for correct implementation of 'redstone get')
How Was This Tested
This was not tested, as I do not know how to actually rebuild java projects or anything; I am just aiming to correct what seems to be a simple typo that breaks important computer monitor functionality.