Skip to content

# restore the OneNote and MCA support-matrix rows lost in the #399/#412 rebases - #433

Merged
Hawkynt merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/restore-onenote-mca-rows
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

Hawkynt merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/restore-onenote-mca-rows

Conversation

@Hawkynt

@Hawkynt Hawkynt commented Sep 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

Restores the OneNote and Mca rows of the Hawkynt.FileFormats.Archives support matrix to the text their PRs (#399, #412) wrote. Rebasing those branches resolved a conflict in the generated API-count line by taking main's whole README, which silently dropped each branch's own row edit.

Verification

  • Rows compared line-for-line with the original PR commits (8470d93, 50a1c9a).
  • ArchivesReadmeStateTests, OneNote and MCA tests pass locally.

…and #412 were rebased

Symptom: after #399 and #412 were merged, the package README still showed
the old OneNote row (no note) and the old MCA row (raw LZ4, no mention of
LZ4-Java block streams or oversized .mcc chunks).

Root cause: while rebasing those branches onto main, the conflict in the
generated API-count line of Hawkynt.FileFormats.Archives/README.md was
resolved by taking main's whole file, which also discarded each branch's
edit to its own support-matrix row.

Fix: restore both rows exactly as the original PR commits wrote them.
@Hawkynt
Hawkynt force-pushed the docs/restore-onenote-mca-rows branch from 0ab189d to 9269460 Compare September 30, 2026 20:58
@Hawkynt
Hawkynt merged commit 4834f88 into main Sep 30, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant