-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
feat: configurable max_loop in build_kg #133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ChenZiHong-Gavin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces enhanced flexibility to the knowledge graph construction process by externalizing the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully makes the max_loop parameter configurable for the knowledge graph building process, which is a good improvement over the previous hardcoded value. The changes are logical and correctly propagated from the service layer down to the KG builder. I have one suggestion to improve the robustness of handling the new configuration parameter to prevent potential crashes from invalid input.
| backend=graph_backend, working_dir=working_dir, namespace="graph" | ||
| ) | ||
| self.build_kwargs = build_kwargs | ||
| self.max_loop: int = int(self.build_kwargs.get("max_loop", 3)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The direct conversion using int() can raise a ValueError if the max_loop value in build_kwargs is not a valid integer (e.g., an empty string or non-numeric text). This would cause the operator initialization to fail. It's safer to handle this potential error with a try-except block to ensure robustness, log a warning, and fall back to a default value.
| self.max_loop: int = int(self.build_kwargs.get("max_loop", 3)) | |
| max_loop_val = self.build_kwargs.get("max_loop", 3) | |
| try: | |
| self.max_loop: int = int(max_loop_val) | |
| except (ValueError, TypeError): | |
| self.logger.warning( | |
| f"Invalid value for max_loop: '{max_loop_val}'. Using default value of 3." | |
| ) | |
| self.max_loop = 3 |
This PR makes the max_loop parameter configurable in the knowledge graph building process, replacing a previously hardcoded value of 3 loops.