Repository navigation
feat(orcid): report authors whose deposited ORCID names someone else - #532
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Adds /orcid_mismatch under Authorship. It walks every author entry carrying an ORCID that is on the Janelia roster and reports the ones where the deposited name shares no token with the name we hold for that ORCID - the credit has landed on the wrong Janelian. Found while chasing an extra jrc_author on 10.7554/elife.93659: eLife's deposit carries one person's ORCID on a different author's entry, so every refresh credited someone who is not on the paper. Comparing names naively gives 137 hits, nearly all of them one person written two ways. Three things cut that to 6 real findings: - Names are accent-folded through NFKD, so Loesche and Losche match. - An inverted "Family, Given" deposit is uninverted before comparison. - A single shared token is enough to call it the same person. That covers a swapped name order, a middle initial, a dropped accent and a misspelt surname - all the publisher rendering one person differently, rather than naming another. The ORCID itself is matched exactly; rapidfuzz only ranks the output, so the report still works if the library is missing. The page says plainly that removing the credit will not make it stay removed: the error is in the deposit, and update_dois.py re-reads the same ORCID on the next refresh. The fix is a publisher correction. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds /orcid_mismatch under Authorship. It walks every author entry carrying an ORCID that is on the Janelia roster and reports the ones where the deposited name shares no token with the name we hold for that ORCID - the credit has landed on the wrong Janelian.
Found while chasing an extra jrc_author on 10.7554/elife.93659: eLife's deposit carries one person's ORCID on a different author's entry, so every refresh credited someone who is not on the paper.
Comparing names naively gives 137 hits, nearly all of them one person written two ways. Three things cut that to 6 real findings:
The ORCID itself is matched exactly; rapidfuzz only ranks the output, so the report still works if the library is missing.
The page says plainly that removing the credit will not make it stay removed: the error is in the deposit, and update_dois.py re-reads the same ORCID on the next refresh. The fix is a publisher correction.
@stuarteberg