Add ENLIL: open-source multi-agent LLM council with PQC-signed decisions

[conchaestradamiguelangel-droid]

Adding ENLIL to Multi-Agent Task Solver Projects.

9 AI models deliberate in parallel on every query, returning consensus + dissenting views. Every decision signed with ML-DSA-87 (NIST FIPS 204 post-quantum). BYOK, self-hosted, GPL v3.

GitHub: https://github.com/conchaestradamiguelangel-droid/enlil

[Jenqyang]

Decision: Not ready to merge yet.

Reason:

1. Candidate may fit, but the current entry and README lean on promotional framing and fixed named model claims.
2. The standalone OSS value should be clearer given the OpenRouter/BYOK dependency and very early adoption signals.

Next step: Rewrite the entry in neutral technical terms and clarify what remains useful in the self-hosted OSS artifact independent of the hosted model gateway.

[conchaestradamiguelangel-droid]

Thanks for the specific feedback. Rewrote the entry: removed the promotional framing and the fixed model-count claim, and reworded to make clear the orchestration/aggregation/signing pipeline is the standalone OSS artifact -- it works with any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, not tied to a specific model set. OpenRouter/BYOK is just the transport layer for model access, not a hard dependency of the core logic.

[Jenqyang]

Decision: Still not ready to merge.

Reason:

1. The rewritten line is better, but it is still long and provider/example heavy for the README.
2. The upstream README still reads as claims-heavy/promotional for a very new project with limited external evidence.
3. Under the stricter curation bar, this needs clearer standalone OSS usage evidence and a shorter neutral description before inclusion.

Next step: Keep the entry concise and technical, avoid branded/mythic framing and provider callouts, and add clearer docs or usage evidence that show the project is ready for a curated agent list.

[conchaestradamiguelangel-droid]

Shortened the ENLIL line and dropped the provider/standard specifics (OpenRouter/BYOK, ML-DSA-87/NIST FIPS 204) as requested — now matches the style of the other one-line entries. Ready for another look.

[conchaestradamiguelangel-droid]

Updated the entry per your feedback — shorter and purely functional, no provider references or framing:

Let me know if you need any further adjustments.

[conchaestradamiguelangel-droid]

Following up — the entry has been at the shortened, neutral one-liner (no provider references, no framing) since the last update on 07/09. Happy to adjust further if there is still something specific blocking it, otherwise just flagging for another look when you have time.