Use .. (with spaces)

[lbenet]

It seems that Julia nightly gets sometimes confussed with the use of .. to represent intervals; see e.g. this error; this prevents a succesful precompilation. This PR aims to solve that, surounding it by spaces, ... I though i have done it before...

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

	master	a0b1d05...	master / a0b1d05...
10 dimensional/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	3.44 ± 0.027 s	3.43 ± 0.029 s	1 ± 0.012
10 dimensional/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	51.8 s	51.9 s	0.998
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 1/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	3.64 ± 0.17 μs	3.66 ± 0.12 μs	0.995 ± 0.057
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 1/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	3.67 ± 0.17 μs	3.66 ± 0.12 μs	1 ± 0.057
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 2/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	0.111 ± 0.0015 ms	0.107 ± 0.0013 ms	1.04 ± 0.019
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 2/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	0.249 ± 0.01 ms	0.245 ± 0.01 ms	1.02 ± 0.061
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 3/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	0.402 ± 0.014 ms	0.257 ± 0.013 ms	1.57 ± 0.096
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 3/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	0.308 ± 0.013 ms	0.184 ± 0.011 ms	1.68 ± 0.12
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 4/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	0.0531 ± 0.00084 ms	0.0524 ± 0.00075 ms	1.01 ± 0.022
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 4/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	0.0354 ± 0.0016 ms	0.0352 ± 0.0013 ms	1.01 ± 0.058
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 5/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	3.44 ± 0.11 μs	3.5 ± 0.15 μs	0.98 ± 0.053
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 5/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	3.45 ± 0.12 μs	3.5 ± 0.16 μs	0.986 ± 0.057
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 6/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	14.1 ± 0.28 μs	13.9 ± 0.28 μs	1.02 ± 0.029
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 6/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	21.6 ± 0.47 μs	21.1 ± 0.47 μs	1.02 ± 0.032
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 7/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	3.73 ± 0.14 μs	3.8 ± 0.18 μs	0.982 ± 0.059
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 7/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	3.74 ± 0.14 μs	3.81 ± 0.17 μs	0.982 ± 0.058
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 9/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	4.05 ± 0.14 μs	4.1 ± 0.17 μs	0.988 ± 0.053
Dietmar-Ratz/Dietmar-Ratz 9/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	4.06 ± 0.13 μs	4.07 ± 0.17 μs	0.998 ± 0.053
Rastigrin stationary points/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	0.147 ± 0.0011 s	0.147 ± 0.0015 s	0.998 ± 0.012
Rastigrin stationary points/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	0.14 ± 0.00055 s	0.14 ± 0.0012 s	1 ± 0.0096
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 2.2/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	2.75 ± 0.049 ms	2.69 ± 0.045 ms	1.02 ± 0.025
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 2.2/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	2.14 ± 0.04 ms	2.13 ± 0.035 ms	1 ± 0.025
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.2/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	0.0387 ± 0.0036 s	0.038 ± 0.0034 s	1.02 ± 0.13
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.2/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	0.0334 ± 0.0032 s	0.0332 ± 0.0033 s	1.01 ± 0.14
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.4/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	2.07 ± 0.046 ms	1.89 ± 0.028 ms	1.1 ± 0.029
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.4/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	1.79 ± 0.035 ms	1.93 ± 0.032 ms	0.926 ± 0.024
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.5/IntervalRootFinding.Krawczyk	5.31 s	5.28 s	1.01
Smiley/Smiley and Chun (2001), Example 5.5/IntervalRootFinding.Newton	4.9 ± 0.067 s	4.9 ± 0.058 s	1 ± 0.018
time_to_load	0.39 ± 0.002 s	0.391 ± 0.0027 s	0.999 ± 0.0085

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results have been uploaded as an artifact to the workflow run for this PR.
Go to "Actions"->"Benchmark a pull request"->[the most recent run]->"Artifacts" (at the bottom).

[lbenet]

Merging, as agreed in the JuliaInterval call

[dpsanders]

Julia bug in parsing of .. reported here.

[dpsanders]

@lbenet This should have been fixed in JuliaLang/julia#62206