Skip to content

feat: integrate ProcessorRegistry interface into ProcessorBuilder #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

walmir-silva
Copy link
Contributor

  • Refactored ProcessorRegistry to implement the ProcessorRegistryContract interface, ensuring compliance with contract standards.
  • Enhanced ProcessorBuilder to leverage ProcessorRegistry for dynamic processor retrieval and seamless configuration.
  • Improved ProcessorBuilder functionality to support both individual processor instantiation and the creation of processor pipelines for specified contexts.

- Refactored `ProcessorRegistry` to implement the `ProcessorRegistryContract` interface, ensuring compliance with contract standards.
- Enhanced `ProcessorBuilder` to leverage `ProcessorRegistry` for dynamic processor retrieval and seamless configuration.
- Improved `ProcessorBuilder` functionality to support both individual processor instantiation and the creation of processor pipelines for specified contexts.
@walmir-silva walmir-silva merged commit 94926b2 into main Oct 13, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant