Skip to content

Conversation

@gmlueck
Copy link
Contributor

@gmlueck gmlueck commented Jul 12, 2024

Relax the requirements on the backend for a default-constructed event object. Previously, we required the backend for such an event to be the same as the backend for the default device. After some implementation experience, we decided that this is not practical. Requiring interoperation with a particular backend constrains the implementation too much. It also seems arbitrary to require the default-constructed event to have a particular backend. To address these concerns, we now say that the backend that is associated with a default-constructed event is implementation defined.

Relax the requirements on the backend for a default-constructed `event`
object.  Previously, we required the backend for such an event to be the
same as the backend for the default device.  After some implementation
experience, we decided that this is not practical.  Requiring
interoperation with a particular backend constrains the implementation
too much.  It also seems arbitrary to require the default-constructed
event to have a particular backend.  To address these concerns, we now
say that the backend that is associated with a default-constructed
event is implementation defined.
Copy link
Contributor

@illuhad illuhad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@tomdeakin
Copy link
Contributor

Discussed previously and revisit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants