WIP: Shell dry-run validation with thickness arg

[pierremtb]

@nadr0 I was playing with this today. Moves the shell validation to the last argument (thickness) so we can run it on provided selections and thickness. Maybe this workflow could become the default one for the review stage of the command bar process. Or evolve into something else. But I figured this wasn't the only command that it could be useful for. Let me know if you have any thoughts

[qa-wolf]

QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up.
Click here to request test coverage for this PR!

[qa-wolf]

QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up.
Click here to request test coverage for this PR!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
modeling-app	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Feb 3, 2025 6:36pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.95%. Comparing base (3e8ee3f) to head (82d1fe5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5118   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.95%   85.95%           
=======================================
  Files          90       90           
  Lines       32912    32912           
=======================================
  Hits        28291    28291           
  Misses       4621     4621           

Flag	Coverage Δ
wasm-lib	85.95% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nadr0]

Yeah this is a good idea within the command bar. Since the user provides these values step by step, it makes sense to help them from shooting themselves in their foot.