fix: if upgradeable_v3 program missing program data, treat as Closed#311
Merged
Aursen merged 2 commits intoLiteSVM:masterfrom Mar 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
MicaiahReid
changed the title
MicaiahReid
changed the title
Aursen
force-pushed
the
fix/close-program-account
branch
from
282be74 to
f1c7507
Compare
Aursen
approved these changes
Mar 20, 2026
Aursen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2026
…311) * test: close upgradeable program * fix(litesvm): if upgradeable_v3 program missing program data, treat as Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
6aaf78c - test commit to demonstrate that invoking a close program leads to a panic
282be74 - potential fix: in
load_program, if it's an upgradeable_v3 program with missing programdata account, return aProgramCacheEntrywith typeProgramCacheEntryType::Closed.The inline rs-docs on that
Closedvariant saysSo here I'm assuming it's safe to mark all missing programdata accounts as "Closed", even if they were never deployed.
I'm not sure if there's a footgun I'm missing here, please enlighten me if so.
Also, note the PR was co-authored with Codex