Skip to content

Conversation

mikeshultz
Copy link
Contributor

I've recently had renewed need for this project so I jumped in again. Per our conversation in #4, I've made a bunch of improvements and fixed a few bugs. Error handling is especially better in this iteration.

I understand if this is out of scope for your project. I'm happy to maintain a parallel branch if you don't want to merge this.

If you're still interested, give it a review and let me know if you have any feedback.

@mikeshultz mikeshultz mentioned this pull request Mar 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants