Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade core-js from 3.12.1 to 3.15.1 #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ntaheij
Copy link
Member

@ntaheij ntaheij commented Jul 14, 2021

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade core-js from 3.12.1 to 3.15.1.

merge advice
As this is a private repository, Snyk-bot does not have access. Therefore, this PR has been created automatically, but appears to have been created by a real user.

✨ Snyk has automatically assigned this pull request, set who gets assigned.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 5 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2021-06-22.
Release notes
Package name: core-js
  • 3.15.1 - 2021-06-22
    • Fixed cloning of regex through RegExp constructor, #948
  • 3.15.0 - 2021-06-20
    • Added RegExp named capture groups polyfill, #521, #944
    • Added RegExp dotAll flag polyfill, #792, #944
    • Added missed polyfills of Annex B features (required mainly for some non-browser engines), #336, #945:
      • escape
      • unescape
      • String.prototype.substr
      • Date.prototype.getYear
      • Date.prototype.setYear
      • Date.prototype.toGMTString
    • Fixed detection of forbidden host code points in URL polyfill
    • Allowed rhino target in core-js-compat / core-js-builder, added compat data for rhino 1.7.13, #942, thanks @ gausie
    • .at marked as supported from FF90
  • 3.14.0 - 2021-06-05
    • Added polyfill of stable sort in { Array, %TypedArray% }.prototype.sort, #769
    • Fixed Safari 14.0- %TypedArray%.prototype.sort validation of arguments bug
    • .at marked as supported from V8 9.2
  • 3.13.1 - 2021-05-29
    • Overwrites get-own-property-symbols third-party Symbol polyfill if it's used since it causes a stack overflow, #774
    • Added a workaround of possible browser crash on Object.prototype accessors methods in WebKit ~ Android 4.0, #232
  • 3.13.0 - 2021-05-25
  • 3.12.1 - 2021-05-08
    • Fixed some cases of Function#toString with multiple core-js instances
    • Fixed some possible String#split polyfill problems in V8 5.1
from core-js GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: core-js
  • d7409d1 3.15.1
  • aa66fb2 fix cloning of regex through `RegExp` constructor, close #948
  • e8d9527 update dependencies
  • 4f7f304 3.15.0
  • 1449fe6 fix a typo
  • 219b688 fix dotAll entry
  • 8d931af add links to PRs
  • 913625f Merge pull request #944 from zloirock/re
  • 12e0678 disable `.groups` prototype check because of a bug in Safari implementation
  • bae33e0 revert test of delegation to `.exec().groups` in `.replace`
  • 70842e9 add some tests
  • 9a91e18 some stylistic changes
  • dded201 some more tests
  • bccff54 some protections
  • 3b9c785 update compat data
  • e485690 some improvements
  • f7b619d simplify `fix-regexp-well-known-symbol-logic`
  • 3646a74 some improvements
  • 3f5640c untangle `fix-regexp-well-known-symbol-logic` by moving feature detection to related modules
  • 1a510ac add basic NCG support
  • 0efc25a add `.dotAll` support
  • fad1d44 Merge pull request #945 from zloirock/annex-b
  • 5c63b94 update the readme
  • 94d5432 update the readme

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

👩‍💻 Set who automatically gets assigned

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants