Ingest trials and structured behavior

[CBroz1]

Description

This PR aims to address...

• Insert invalid_times to IntervalList #1336
• Initial table drafts for: Support for structured behavioral data #1343 - pending...
  • PyPI publication of ndx_structured_behavior
  • Addressing dependency conflict:
    • ndx_franklab_novela requires hdmf<5,>=4.0.0
    • ndx_structured_behavior requires hdmf<4,>=2.5.6
• Add relevant tests - pending release, test objects in extension?
• Add 'UsingNWB' documentation

Previous discussion points:

• Move to common_task or common_behav? No, keep independent schema for a given nwb extension
• Change to Imported table? No, planning to integrate into SpyglassIngestion pending Standardize nwb ingestion #1377
• Ingest each item as an interval list? No, that would be excessive. Downstream tables should selectively insert

Checklist:

• No. This PR should be accompanied by a release: (yes/no/unsure)
• N/a. If release, I have updated the CITATION.cff
• No. This PR makes edits to table definitions: (yes/no)
• N/a. If table edits, I have included an alter snippet for release notes.
• N/a. If this PR makes changes to position, I ran the relevant tests locally.
• I have updated the CHANGELOG.md with PR number and description.
• I have added/edited docs/notebooks to reflect the changes

[weiglszonja]

Hey @CBroz1 ,

I'm currently relying on this branch for the ndx_structured_behavior support in catalystneuro/pagan-lab-to-nwb#3. I wanted to check in on the PR status, since it's been in draft for a while and has drifted from upstream main.

Is there anything blocking the PR from being merged into main?

If the PR is far from being merged, I'd consider switching to my own fork (here) to have a stable base.

Thanks!

[CBroz1]

Is there anything blocking the PR from being merged into main?

Yes, we're waiting on the pypi release of the extension, so that everything remains pip installable. I don't have a good sense from @rly as to when that might happen