Require material overlap with cited probe evidence - #40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The post-#39 live reply for
0909b-meta.949cited a real context sequence but shared only the words “cryptographic identity” with it, allowing an unsupported generic conclusion. Replace the one-token grounding check with a material token-overlap threshold and cover both the rejected live pattern and a substantive self-hosted-signing example. Also recognize the observed plain random-suffix presence variant.95/95 tests pass locally. The change remains fail closed and does not alter signature, age-window, or deduplication checks.