Skip to content

Conversation

@def-
Copy link
Contributor

@def- def- commented Oct 23, 2025

Would have caught https://materializeinc.slack.com/archives/C08ACQNGSQK/p1759754676092499

Let's see if it's fixed in Nightly already: https://buildkite.com/materialize/nightly/builds/13849

Edit: Blocked on rust-lang/rust#146998

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

@def- def- requested review from antiguru and teskje October 23, 2025 10:26
@def- def- requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2025 10:26
Copy link
Member

@antiguru antiguru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@def- def- force-pushed the pr-release-build branch 2 times, most recently from 2a8ea0b to bd0e735 Compare October 23, 2025 13:14
@def- def- marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2025 14:32
@def-
Copy link
Contributor Author

def- commented Oct 23, 2025

It fails: (signal: 9, SIGKILL: kill)

Locally it fails for me the same way as in https://materializeinc.slack.com/archives/C08ACQNGSQK/p1759754676092499, but a bit weird that it shows up as a signal 9 in CI without logging.

@def- def- force-pushed the pr-release-build branch from bd0e735 to 5109181 Compare October 23, 2025 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants