Reworks & update ship guidelines #20
Reworks & update ship guidelines #20UnicornOnLSD wants to merge 10 commits intoMonolith-Station:masterfrom
Conversation
Reorganize and expand ship guidelines for clarity and detail, including mandatory requirements for ship PRs, general guidelines, and scrapyard guidelines.
|
Finally, some proper guidelines |
Clarified guidelines for ship image rendering and saved ship locations. Updated design standards for TSF and PDV factions.
Co-authored-by: Ilya246 <57039557+Ilya246@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ilya246 <57039557+Ilya246@users.noreply.github.com>
Clarified thruster exhaust path requirements and added specific space recommendations for thrusters.
|
Capitals should have a case by case basis due to their large size and uses. |
Thrusters have been changed to "keep exhaust free" with 3 tiles for small and 7 for large Capital part I'll let you add that personally. |
|
Waiting on fluffen for merging Will do special guidelines for ADS, carriers & fighters in a separate PR another time. |
|
TODO: add ruling about consistent ship mounts (high tech ship uses lasers lowtech rust bucket uses ballistic, EMP exempt for boarding encouragement for pirate focused ships) |
|
actually this can go now I'll do other guidelines later |
|
Probably add a section in regards to EMP weaponry should be on a seperated tab - so energy focused armament ships get missiles and ballistic focused armaments get energy EMPs - etc. |
I've expanded on the combat ruling section. Lmk what you think |
Added several parts, expanded heavily on combat guidelines & ruling to hopefully make expectations clearer.
| * Circuit imprinter | ||
| * Arti chamber is permitted to use plastitanium walls/windows, even if it is a civilian vessel | ||
|
|
||
| *Advanced medical:* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It might look nicer to put Advanced Medical below Medical at line 189.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah that's valid. Will fix later
6 participants
Title.
I need verification from you all especially on the spots commented with [R] (see the code file for them), criticism is more than welcome for parts that aren't just an update to current standards.