-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 0
FPM-566 Add support for alt data infilling #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Potentially, yes. In the time series processor, each variable is held in it's own TimeFrame, so that would need this use case. I guess you could add option to send a new |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to accept this as is for now, and have another ticket for the alt data coming from another source if you want.
But can you just add something to the user_guide/infilling.rst page as well?
Co-authored-by: richjam <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: richjam <[email protected]>
…rovided to time-stream
docs/source/user_guide/infilling.rst
Outdated
| The :meth:`~time_stream.TimeFrame.infill` method is the entry point for infilling your | ||
| timeseries data in **Time-Stream**. It delegates to well established methods from the `SciPy data science library | ||
| <https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/interpolate.html>`_, combined with the time-integrity of your **TimeFrame**. | ||
| timeseries data in **Time-Stream**. There are various infill methods available; from using alternative data from |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added suggested changes to this docs page (and associated "examples" code folder). Please can you review?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry where are these suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unit tests failing
This requires the alternative data to be part of the existing dataframe, maybe we want this to support alternative data from a different source/dataframe? @richjam what do you think?