Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Shims for adding Databricks 14.3 Support [databricks] #11635

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds Shims for Databricks 14.3

Signed-off-by: Raza Jafri <[email protected]>
@sameerz sameerz added the feature request New feature or request label Oct 19, 2024
@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gerashegalov @mythrocks PTAL

@gerashegalov gerashegalov self-requested a review October 30, 2024 00:26
Copy link
Collaborator

@gerashegalov gerashegalov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please upmerge

I cannot build this PR branch. It seems to be missing the release350db profile etc.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file should be dropped after upmerging to branch-24.12

@gerashegalov
Copy link
Collaborator

Please update Scala 2.13 poms

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gerashegalov I have addressed your concerns. PTAL

Copy link
Collaborator

@gerashegalov gerashegalov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. at least one copyright to update

gerashegalov
gerashegalov previously approved these changes Nov 4, 2024
@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

@mythrocks
Copy link
Collaborator

It's looking good to go, now that the build is passing as well, no?

@NvTimLiu
Copy link
Collaborator

NvTimLiu commented Nov 7, 2024

@razajafri Can you enable Databricks-14.3 in the pre-merge CI pipeline in this PR as below?

https://github.com/NVIDIA/spark-rapids/blob/branch-24.12/jenkins/Jenkinsfile-blossom.premerge-databricks#L94

values '11.3', '12.2', '13.3', '14.3'

mythrocks
mythrocks previously approved these changes Nov 7, 2024
@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@razajafri Can you enable Databricks-14.3 in the pre-merge CI pipeline in this PR as below?

https://github.com/NVIDIA/spark-rapids/blob/branch-24.12/jenkins/Jenkinsfile-blossom.premerge-databricks#L94

values '11.3', '12.2', '13.3', '14.3'

I have updated it but this will turn the integration tests on. We don't want the integration tests to run against Databricks 14.3 because we aren't ready.

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

1 similar comment
@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

AWS_INSUFFICIENT_INSTANCE_CAPACITY_FAILURE

@razajafri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

build

1 similar comment
@pxLi
Copy link
Collaborator

pxLi commented Nov 11, 2024

build

@pxLi
Copy link
Collaborator

pxLi commented Nov 11, 2024

build

AWS_INSUFFICIENT_INSTANCE_CAPACITY_FAILURE

This change requires 8 clusters (4 shims x 2 parallelism) for the CI. We're considering using some escalation strategy, such as switching to different instance types or cloud providers or temporarily disabling parallel runs for Databricks runtimes.

also cc @NvTimLiu

BTW my last trigger works fine

@razajafri razajafri merged commit 57b8caa into NVIDIA:branch-24.12 Nov 13, 2024
49 checks passed
@razajafri razajafri deleted the SP-10661-db-14.3-2 branch November 13, 2024 18:34
@razajafri razajafri restored the SP-10661-db-14.3-2 branch November 14, 2024 02:15
@razajafri razajafri deleted the SP-10661-db-14.3-2 branch November 14, 2024 04:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants