Skip to content

Conversation

@wouitmil
Copy link

In order to avoid impatient user to click multiple time to generate new labels for the same batch, I added an advisory lock

imlopes and others added 30 commits August 29, 2025 09:55
- change name to batch to match with change of `picking_dispatch` name to
`stock_batch_picking`
- mode description in README.rst
- move files in models and views directories
- change headers to small license header
- use api 8.0
- fix and improve tests
the field has been renamed in the base module
Probably due to usage of multiple environment and cache. datas can't be
read from shipping.label but it can be read from ir.attachment
When there is more than 1 pack in a picking, 2 or more thread worker
might be in concurrence on the same picking, which makes one of the
transaction fails, resulting in the abort of the whole label generation.

The solution implemented is to change the way of passing the tasks to
the thread workers. Instead of passing a label at a time, we pass a
group of label. A group of label actually contains all the labels to
generate for one picking.
Co-Authored-By: Alexandre Fayolle <[email protected]>
OCA-git-bot and others added 17 commits August 29, 2025 09:55
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/
Currently translated at 2.8% (1 of 35 strings)

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (35 of 35 strings)

Translation: delivery-carrier-14.0/delivery-carrier-14.0-delivery_carrier_label_batch
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/delivery-carrier-14-0/delivery-carrier-14-0-delivery_carrier_label_batch/es/
…er_code`

    This line has been added by OCA@3b0232d but it looks like the field carrier_code has never been added to the model (or at least it has never been merged in the OCA repo?), thus we get following error when updating the ``carrier_id``:
    ```
    [...]
      File "/odoo/src/addons/web/models/models.py", line 1005, in onchange
        record._apply_onchange_methods(field_name, result)
      File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 7364, in _apply_onchange_methods
        res = method(self)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^
      File "/odoo/external-src/delivery-carrier/delivery_carrier_label_batch/models/stock_batch_picking.py", line 61, in onchange_carrier_id
        self.carrier_code = self.carrier_id.code
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    AttributeError: 'stock.picking.batch' object has no attribute 'carrier_code'

    The above server error caused the following client error:
    RPC_ERROR: Odoo Server Error
        RPC_ERROR
            at makeErrorFromResponse (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3144:163)
            at XMLHttpRequest.<anonymous> (http://localhost:8069/web/assets/e5ed061/web.assets_web.min.js:3149:13)
    ```
… by ``UserError.args[0]``

In the label generation, when getting an error, we were using its ``name``, however, this is deprecated since a while and as been removed in odoo/odoo@d200dcf.
We should use ``args[0]`` instead.
… return ``stock.move.line`` records instead of an Iterator

All calls to this method expect ``stock.move.line`` records.
Regenerating the carrier labels would crash with a Concurent Update
error.

We use a new cursor for tracking reference purge and avoid concurrent update
when the labels regeneration also updates that field in a separate
cursor afterwards: this ensures that the purge is committed before the
transactions created by the threads also update and commit their own
changes.
Don't spawn more threads than needed: if there are fewer groups to
process than the configured max number of threads, only start the
specified number of threads.
@wouitmil wouitmil changed the title 18 add advisory lock by batch for generation [18.0][IMP] add advisory lock by batch for generation Nov 11, 2025
@wouitmil wouitmil force-pushed the 18-add-advisory-lock-by-batch-for-generation branch from b703e81 to 6c99e2f Compare November 11, 2025 13:06
Copy link

@cyrilmanuel cyrilmanuel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not an expert but LGTM

@wouitmil wouitmil force-pushed the 18-add-advisory-lock-by-batch-for-generation branch from 91cd4dd to b090c8f Compare November 18, 2025 16:12
@wouitmil wouitmil force-pushed the 18-add-advisory-lock-by-batch-for-generation branch 2 times, most recently from 1b271d3 to 12863df Compare December 3, 2025 09:00
@wouitmil wouitmil force-pushed the 18-add-advisory-lock-by-batch-for-generation branch from 12863df to 2caf2dd Compare December 3, 2025 09:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.