Added test cases for YearlyEventCalendar.tsx #3712
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request adds a new test suite for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant T as Test Runner
participant C as YearlyEventCalendar
participant U as User
T->>C: Render component
U->>C: Click "Next Year" button
C-->>T: Update displayed year (+1)
U->>C: Click "Previous Year" button
C-->>T: Update displayed year (-1)
U->>C: Click expand/collapse button for events
C-->>T: Toggle event list display
T->>C: Simulate window resize
C-->>T: Adjust responsive layout
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/EventCalender/Yearly/YearlyEventCalender.spec.tsx (3)
14-20: Consider renaming the wait function for better clarity.While the implementation is correct, consider renaming the function to better describe its purpose, such as
waitForAsyncOperationsorwaitForComponentUpdate.-async function wait(ms = 200): Promise<void> { +async function waitForComponentUpdate(ms = 200): Promise<void> { await act(() => { return new Promise((resolve) => { setTimeout(resolve, ms); }); }); }
55-64: Add boundary case handling for year transition.The current year test might be flaky if run close to year transition (e.g., New Year's Eve). Consider mocking the Date object to ensure consistent behavior.
+ beforeEach(() => { + const mockDate = new Date('2024-06-15'); + vi.spyOn(global, 'Date').mockImplementation(() => mockDate); + }); + it('initializes with the current year', () => { render( <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <Calendar eventData={[]} /> </I18nextProvider>, ); - const currentYear = new Date().getFullYear(); + const currentYear = 2024; expect(screen.getByText(currentYear.toString())).toBeInTheDocument(); });
92-111: Enhance event list expansion test coverage.The current test only checks basic expand/collapse functionality. Consider adding tests for:
- Multiple events in the list
- Event details visibility
- Error states
it('handles expanding and collapsing event lists', () => { + const mockEvents = [ + { id: '1', title: 'Event 1', date: '2024-01-01' }, + { id: '2', title: 'Event 2', date: '2024-01-02' } + ]; render( <Router> <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> - <Calendar eventData={[]} /> + <Calendar eventData={mockEvents} /> </I18nextProvider> </MockedProvider> </Router>, ); const expandButton = screen.queryAllByRole('button', { name: /view more/i, }); if (expandButton.length) { fireEvent.click(expandButton[0]); + // Check if events are visible + expect(screen.getByText('Event 1')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByText('Event 2')).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(screen.getByText(/close/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.click(screen.getByText(/close/i)); + // Check if events are hidden + expect(screen.queryByText('Event 1')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); } });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/EventCalender/Yearly/YearlyEventCalender.spec.tsx(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/EventCalender/Yearly/YearlyEventCalender.spec.tsx (2)
1-13: LGTM! Comprehensive test setup with all necessary dependencies.The test file is well-structured with appropriate imports for testing React components, including React Testing Library, Apollo mocking, and i18n support.
22-128: Overall test coverage looks good with room for improvements.The test suite covers all major functionality of the YearlyEventCalender component. While the basic test structure is solid, consider implementing the suggested improvements to make the tests more robust and comprehensive.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3712 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 86.09% 86.09%
=================================================
Files 371 371
Lines 9138 9138
Branches 1925 1925
=================================================
Hits 7867 7867
+ Misses 906 905 -1
- Partials 365 366 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Testing
Issue Number:
Fixes #3584
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Added a new test file for YearlyEventCalender
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
N/A
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit