Skip to content

Feat/implement contract upgradeability#150

Closed
psychemist wants to merge 2 commits into
Predictify-org:masterfrom
psychemist:feat/implement-contract-upgradeability
Closed

Feat/implement contract upgradeability#150
psychemist wants to merge 2 commits into
Predictify-org:masterfrom
psychemist:feat/implement-contract-upgradeability

Conversation

@psychemist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Contract Upgrade & Rollback System

📋 Basic Information

Implements a robust upgrade and rollback system for the Predictify Hybrid contract, including version management, admin controls, event emission, and comprehensive tests. Enables safe contract evolution and operational flexibility for mainnet/testnet deployments.

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📚 Documentation update
  • 🧪 Test addition/update
  • 🔧 Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • ⚡ Performance improvement
  • 🔒 Security fix
  • 🎨 UI/UX improvement
  • 🚀 Deployment/Infrastructure change

Related Issues

Resolves #90

Priority Level

  • 🔴 Critical (blocking other development)
  • 🟡 High (significant impact)
  • 🟢 Medium (moderate impact)
  • 🔵 Low (minor improvement)

📝 Detailed Description

What does this PR do?

Implements the contract upgrade and rollback system for Predictify Hybrid, including:

  • UpgradeManager, UpgradeValidator, RollbackManager, and supporting data structures.
  • Upgrade event emission and logging.
  • Safety and compatibility checks for upgrades.
  • Rollback logic with admin controls and event emission.
  • Comprehensive unit tests for upgrade and rollback flows.

Why is this change needed?

This enables safe, auditable, and admin-controlled contract upgrades and rollbacks, which are critical for maintaining and evolving the contract on mainnet/testnet. It ensures upgradability, security, and operational flexibility.

How was this tested?

  • Added and ran unit tests for all upgrade and rollback flows, including edge cases (unauthorized, in-progress, no backup/history).
  • Manual review of event emission and storage logic.

Alternative Solutions Considered

  • Considered a simpler upgrade system without rollback, but chose this for safety and auditability.

🏗️ Smart Contract Specific

Contract Changes

Please check all that apply:

  • Core contract logic modified
  • Oracle integration changes (Pyth/Reflector)
  • New functions added
  • Existing functions modified
  • Storage structure changes
  • Events added/modified
  • Error handling improved
  • Gas optimization
  • Access control changes
  • Admin functions modified
  • Fee structure changes

Oracle Integration

  • Pyth oracle integration affected
  • Reflector oracle integration affected
  • Oracle configuration changes
  • Price feed handling modified
  • Oracle fallback mechanisms
  • Price validation logic

Market Resolution Logic

  • Hybrid resolution algorithm changed
  • Dispute mechanism modified
  • Fee structure updated
  • Voting mechanism changes
  • Community weight calculation
  • Oracle weight calculation

Security Considerations

  • Access control reviewed
  • Reentrancy protection
  • Input validation
  • Overflow/underflow protection
  • Oracle manipulation protection

🧪 Testing

Test Coverage

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • All tests passing locally
  • Manual testing completed
  • Oracle integration tested
  • Edge cases covered
  • Error conditions tested
  • Gas usage optimized
  • Cross-contract interactions tested

Test Results

# Paste test output here
cargo test
# Expected output: All upgrade and rollback tests pass, no failures

Manual Testing Steps

  1. Ran all unit tests for upgrade/rollback logic.
  2. Verified event emission in storage.
  3. Checked admin access control for upgrade/rollback.

📚 Documentation

Documentation Updates

  • README updated
  • Code comments added/updated
  • API documentation updated
  • Examples updated
  • Deployment instructions updated
  • Contributing guidelines updated
  • Architecture documentation updated

Breaking Changes

Breaking Changes:

  • Storage keys for upgrade/rollback data added.
  • Admin access control for upgrade/rollback.

Migration Guide:

  • Deploy new contract version with upgrade system.
  • Ensure admin is set for upgrade/rollback operations.

🔍 Code Quality

Code Review Checklist

  • Code follows Rust/Soroban best practices
  • Self-review completed
  • No unnecessary code duplication
  • Error handling is appropriate
  • Logging/monitoring added where needed
  • Security considerations addressed
  • Performance implications considered
  • Code is readable and well-commented
  • Variable names are descriptive
  • Functions are focused and small

Performance Impact

  • Gas Usage: Minimal, only on upgrade/rollback.
  • Storage Impact: Additional keys for upgrade/rollback data.
  • Computational Complexity: Low, except during upgrade/rollback.

Security Review

  • No obvious security vulnerabilities
  • Access controls properly implemented
  • Input validation in place
  • Oracle data properly validated
  • No sensitive data exposed

🚀 Deployment & Integration

Deployment Notes

  • Network: Testnet/Mainnet
  • Contract Address: N/A (new deployment)
  • Migration Required: Yes
  • Special Instructions: Set admin address after deployment.

Integration Points

  • Frontend integration considered
  • API changes documented
  • Backward compatibility maintained
  • Third-party integrations updated

📊 Impact Assessment

User Impact

  • End Users: No direct impact unless upgrade/rollback is triggered.
  • Developers: Can safely upgrade/rollback contract.
  • Admins: Gain upgrade/rollback controls.

Business Impact

  • Revenue: Enables safer contract evolution.
  • User Experience: More reliable contract operations.
  • Technical Debt: Reduces risk by enabling safe upgrades.

✅ Final Checklist

Pre-Submission

  • Code follows Rust/Soroban best practices
  • All CI checks passing
  • No breaking changes (or breaking changes are documented)
  • Ready for review
  • PR description is complete and accurate
  • All required sections filled out
  • Test results included
  • Documentation updated

Review Readiness

  • Self-review completed
  • Code is clean and well-formatted
  • Commit messages are clear and descriptive
  • Branch is up to date with main
  • No merge conflicts

📸 Screenshots (if applicable)

  • scarb build
Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 11 24 48

🔗 Additional Resources

  • Design Document: N/A
  • Technical Spec: ₦/A
  • Related Discussion: N/A
  • External Documentation: N/A

💬 Notes for Reviewers

Please pay special attention to:

  • Upgrade/rollback safety and access control logic.
  • Event emission and storage.
  • Test coverage for edge cases.

Questions for reviewers:

  • Any suggestions for further hardening upgrade/rollback flows?
  • Should we add more granular event logs for upgrade steps?

Thank you for your contribution to Predictify! 🚀

@psychemist psychemist marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2025 18:18
@greatest0fallt1me

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@psychemist Can you please fix the pipeline failure?

@psychemist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

on it @greatest0fallt1me

@greatest0fallt1me

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@psychemist Also resolve the conflicts

@greatest0fallt1me

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@psychemist Any updates?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create Upgradeable Contract Pattern with Validation and Rollback

2 participants