Skip to content

Salvage loadout stuff#569

Open
raincally wants to merge 5 commits intoProjectOmu:masterfrom
raincally:salvageloadouts
Open

Salvage loadout stuff#569
raincally wants to merge 5 commits intoProjectOmu:masterfrom
raincally:salvageloadouts

Conversation

@raincally
Copy link
Contributor

@raincally raincally commented Feb 9, 2026

About the PR

Okay so I put the shaft miner stuff into the salv loadout, I also added the cool ass military variant that wasnt being used
And then I made both jobs use the salv loadout

Why / Balance

This is because I think the pink and yellow overalls salvagers get are kind of ugly so I want to give people options

Technical details

Media

image

Requirements

Breaking changes

Changelog

🆑 raincall

  • tweak: Shaft miners and Salvage specialists share jumpsuit loadout now. Also threw in a cool ass military version that wasnt being used for some reason
  • fix: shaft miner traitors can buy the pressure modkit in their uplink again

@github-actions github-actions bot added the S: Untriaged Has not been set a status; currently not labeled. label Feb 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Changes: No C# Purely YAML/non-C#. label Feb 9, 2026
@CliveOcelot
Copy link
Member

@raincally yaml linter fail

@raincally
Copy link
Contributor Author

@raincally yaml linter fail

ok fixed

Copy link
Contributor

@NotActuallyMarty NotActuallyMarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the point of changing the internal name of the items? Change the displayed names there is literally no point to do this and you're making life difficult if upstream makes changes to this or adds anything else related to these items

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Changes: No C# Purely YAML/non-C#. S: Untriaged Has not been set a status; currently not labeled. size/S

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants