Skip to content

Number of fixes to support latest versions of TensorKit#416

Merged
lkdvos merged 9 commits intomainfrom
bd/blockstructure
May 1, 2026
Merged

Number of fixes to support latest versions of TensorKit#416
lkdvos merged 9 commits intomainfrom
bd/blockstructure

Conversation

@borisdevos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TensorKit.FusionBlockStructure got reworked in QuantumKitHub/TensorKit.jl#387, so this PR deals with those changes.

@lkdvos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lkdvos commented Apr 20, 2026

This has to be released after another version of TensorKit is tagged, and subsequently also should increase the minimal TensorKit compat, thanks for already opening the PR!

@kshyatt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kshyatt commented Apr 23, 2026

(I checked with @borisdevos before doing this) I have added a sources pointing to TensorKit main so we can figure out what will need fixing for the next release

@kshyatt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kshyatt commented Apr 24, 2026

Looks like multifusion and algorithms need some TLC... our old friend IsingBimodule has struck again!!

@kshyatt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kshyatt commented Apr 24, 2026

multifusion failure is actually due to BlockTensorKit, I'll open the issue there

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 26, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/utility/utility.jl 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/operators/jordanmpotensor.jl 80.93% <ø> (+80.93%) ⬆️
src/utility/utility.jl 58.68% <50.00%> (+31.13%) ⬆️

... and 78 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@lkdvos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lkdvos commented Apr 26, 2026

I might have some time today to figure the remainder of the issues out here, is it okay if I use this branch for that?

@kshyatt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

kshyatt commented Apr 26, 2026

No objection from me!

@borisdevos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Same here!

@lkdvos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lkdvos commented Apr 26, 2026

Needs QuantumKitHub/TensorKit.jl#418

@borisdevos borisdevos changed the title Changes related to old fusionblockstructure Changes to support TensorKit v0.17 Apr 28, 2026
@lkdvos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lkdvos commented Apr 28, 2026

This will have to wait a bit more I fear, since there are still issues in the TensorKit changes that have to go in first.

@lkdvos lkdvos marked this pull request as draft April 28, 2026 16:52
@lkdvos lkdvos force-pushed the bd/blockstructure branch from 05e2e1d to b47f3d4 Compare April 30, 2026 23:59
@lkdvos lkdvos changed the title Changes to support TensorKit v0.17 Number of fixes to support latest versions of TensorKit May 1, 2026
@lkdvos
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

lkdvos commented May 1, 2026

I am hoping the tests here will pass now, after which I am confident that QuantumKitHub/TensorKit.jl#424 contains enough fixes to be released today, and this can then be released on top of that.

@lkdvos lkdvos force-pushed the bd/blockstructure branch from 0773418 to 7c7cf20 Compare May 1, 2026 13:45
@lkdvos lkdvos force-pushed the bd/blockstructure branch from 7c7cf20 to bad060d Compare May 1, 2026 15:47
@lkdvos lkdvos marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2026 15:48
@lkdvos lkdvos merged commit 4f33d65 into main May 1, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
@lkdvos lkdvos deleted the bd/blockstructure branch May 1, 2026 18:26
@lkdvos lkdvos mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026
lkdvos referenced this pull request May 5, 2026
* Update changelog for v0.13.11

* Bump version to v0.13.11

* manual changelog change

* Update CITATION.cff for v0.13.11

* attempt to precompile before tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants