Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

receiverID and header input and output for all messages #42

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

Angeleon
Copy link
Contributor

As receiverID is desired for CARLA control, here is a suggestion for the first step on how to implement it.

@Angeleon Angeleon requested a review from Robert108 July 21, 2023 13:57
Copy link

@SebastianSvanland SebastianSvanland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks simple enough for the most part. Have you also checked so that all the decoders are correct still? Or did this not change anything significant in that regard?

@Angeleon Angeleon requested a review from sepast August 9, 2023 07:55
Copy link
Contributor

@sepast sepast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work.
Does ATOS work with this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

@sepast sepast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.
Some comments.
We need to review the ATOS branch with this branch before approval.

@vincebel8 vincebel8 mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@victorjarlow victorjarlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is swig necessary for the changes with receiver ID and header of the ISO protocol? If not, split into another PR that deals exclusively with swig-parts

Patrik Lönnberg and others added 4 commits January 9, 2024 10:04
Co-authored-by: victorjarlow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: victorjarlow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: victorjarlow <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: victorjarlow <[email protected]>
@Angeleon Angeleon dismissed victorjarlow’s stale review January 10, 2024 11:41

already discussed

@Angeleon Angeleon merged commit 62d8b4e into master Jan 10, 2024
1 check passed
@Angeleon Angeleon deleted the feature_headerInputOutput branch January 10, 2024 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants