Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
18 tasks
Contributor
Author
|
CI/CD looks good with the new regenerated package-lock.json so I will merge! |
Contributor
Author
|
Closed it by accident. Will merge now. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature Summary
What does this PR change?
-Regenerated
package-lock.jsonWhy was this change made?
-In #50 I had merged the changes for the chat UI component but a merge conflict has issues with playwright test scripts and vitest test scripts. To make sure both were included I added clearer naming and a documented commented change of what the new version looks like. Since package-lock.json is not in sync with package.json when you run npm install I regenerated it to make sure that it's in a new state is up to date and in sync before potential merge conflicts with other PRs as new feature branches come in.
From #50
-Conflict: Multiple version differences (e.g., fsevents 2.3.2 vs 2.3.3)
-Resolution: Accepted dev as placeholder on GitHub UI
-Follow up: Regenerate package-lock.json with correct dependency versions after merge
Rationale: Lock file conflicts are best resolved by letting npm install regenerate them based on the finalized package.json. This will ensure that all dependencies are correctly pinned to compatible versions, both @playwright/test (from feature) and vitest (from dev) are properly resolved, no stale or conflicting transitive dependencies, E2E testing workflow remains fully functional alongside what dev previous had. When conducting the end to end tests, the same thing needed to be installed over and over again so this should fix that.
What is the code meant to do?
-No functionality implemented
Feature Team / Lane
Team #: (1–5) 3
DevOps Lane: (if applicable) DevOps
Type of Change
Testing
How was this tested?
Automated Testing
Manual Testing
Screenshots (if UI changes)
Attach screenshots or screen recordings here if the PR includes UI changes.
Risks / Edge Cases
List any potential risks, limitations, or breaking changes.
Environment Variables Added or Changed
List variable names only. Do not include secrets.
Checklist