Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[EDOI] Add new object types EDOI #681
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[EDOI] Add new object types EDOI #681
Changes from 5 commits
a8ec8b7
499d83a
e1e96b2
ecdefa0
3a2e9b9
6b8c5b2
a158a2a
2759148
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say that having edoc and interface in the name of the variable is unnecessary as the whole object type is about the edoc interface. What do you think?
When you will be using the AFF, it will be something like this, the easier the name, the better
edoi_model-edoc_spec_additional_table[index]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this
edocument_interface_id
andinterface_description
the name and description of this EDOI object?To prevent redundant data, the name is saved in the file name, and the description is saved in
ty_main->header
(where you currently have selected a header with description length 60, but there is also a version for length 80 or length 100 available).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be I might have added 'header' by referring the sample interface. I don't know the purpose of 'header' section. If its not necessary, i will remove it.
Could you please explain the statement "the name is saved in the file name,", As I didn't find the field 'file name'.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We expect
formatVersion
andheader
as mandatory fields. See https://github.com/SAP/abap-file-formats/blob/main/docs/json.md#writing-json-schema-with-abap-typesTherefore, please do not remove it ;)
If you check the file names in AFF, the object name is stored there. There is no need to add it to the file content. This would be redundant data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
corrected, removed object name and description from general information
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does the I in EDOI stand for Interface? Then maybe the description could be: AFF for eDocument Interface (EDOI)