Skip to content

Conversation

@linyan-w
Copy link
Contributor

@linyan-w linyan-w commented Sep 16, 2025

Description

Sungbin found that in the recent reco2 respinning data still had 100 ms e-lifetime...
This PR patches that...!

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

$${\color{red}\bf{\textrm{IMPORTANT UPDATE June 22nd 2025:}}}$$ If you are making a PR which is intended as a patch for the CURRENT production (which started in Spring 2025), you must make two PRs: one for develop and one for the production/v10_06_00 branch.

$${\color{red}!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}$$

Checklist

  • Added at least 1 label from available labels.
  • Assigned at least 1 reviewer under Reviewers,
  • Assigned all contributers including yourself under Assignees
  • Linked any relevant issues under Developement
  • Does this PR affect CAF data format? If so, please assign a CAF maintainer (PetrilloAtWork or JosiePaton) as additional reviewer.
  • Does this affect the standard workflow?
  • Is this PR a patch for the ongoing production? If so, separate PR must also be made for production/v10_06_00 branch!

Relevant PR links (optional)

Does this PR require merging another PR in a different repository (such as sbnanobj/sbnobj etc.)?

Link(s) to docdb describing changes (optional)

Is there a docdb describing the issue this solves or the feature added?

@linyan-w linyan-w self-assigned this Sep 16, 2025
@linyan-w linyan-w added bug Something isn't working calibration calib ntuple or calib workflow related labels Sep 16, 2025
@linyan-w linyan-w marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2025 16:36
Copy link
Contributor

@sungbinoh sungbinoh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @linyan-w for the update. Looks good for me!

@nathanielerowe
Copy link
Contributor

trigger build LArSoft/lar*@LARSOFT_SUITE_v10_11_01

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ CI build for LArSoft Succeeded on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for c14:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

@FNALbuild
Copy link
Collaborator

❌ CI build for SBND Failed at phase build SBND on slf7 for e26:prof -- details available through the CI dashboard

🚨 For more details about the failed phase, check the build SBND phase logs

parent CI build details are available through the CI dashboard

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working calibration calib ntuple or calib workflow related

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants