Skip to content

Conversation

@thetrime
Copy link
Contributor

…ithout any loss of precision. See issue #130

This isn't especially elegant, but it's simple and seems to do the job!

@thetrime thetrime requested a review from JanWielemaker April 30, 2019 12:51
@JanWielemaker
Copy link
Member

Hi Matt, Kind of missed/forgot this. I guess this is still something we want, although the current rational
support may ask for a somewhat different interface.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants