Project added #4
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces new composable functions in the "Stencil Mobile" Android project, specifically for rendering card components using Jetpack Compose. The changes include the addition of Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (7)
app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Type.kt (1)
9-34: Review of Typography definitions.The typography settings are standard and correctly set up for initial use. However, there are several styles commented out. If these are intended for future use, consider adding a TODO or NOTE comment to clarify their purpose or ensure they are included when needed.
+ // TODO: Review and potentially include these styles in future updatesapp/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/MainActivity.kt (2)
33-47: Review of Composable functionsGreetingandGreetingPreview:The
Greetingfunction is a simple composable that displays a greeting message, which is parameterized and modifiable via aModifier. TheGreetingPreviewprovides a preview of theGreetingcomposable within theStencilMobileTheme. Both functions are correctly annotated and make use of composables and theming effectively.Consider adding documentation comments to explain the purpose and usage of these composables, especially if they are to be used or extended in other parts of the app.
+ /** + * Displays a greeting message to the user. + * @param name The name to be included in the greeting. + * @param modifier Modifier for styling and layout customization. + */ fun Greeting(name: String, modifier: Modifier = Modifier) { Text( text = "Hello $name!", modifier = modifier ) }
16-30: Potential Issue withenableEdgeToEdgeMethod:The
enableEdgeToEdgemethod is used without any checks for different Android versions. This could lead to potential issues on older Android versions whereenableEdgeToEdgemight not be supported or could cause unintended layout behavior. It's important to ensure compatibility across different Android versions.Please verify if the
enableEdgeToEdgemethod is defined elsewhere in the project or if there are any version checks implemented in other parts of the codebase.Analysis chain
Review of
MainActivityclass andonCreatemethod:The
MainActivityclass extendsComponentActivityand correctly overrides theonCreatemethod. TheenableEdgeToEdgemethod is used to extend the app content into the areas behind system bars, which is a modern practice for immersive interfaces. ThesetContentblock defines the UI using Jetpack Compose, which is well-structured and correctly utilizes theme and layout components.However, ensure that the
enableEdgeToEdgemethod is appropriately handled across different Android versions and devices, as it can affect layout behavior in unintended ways.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for conditional handling of `enableEdgeToEdge` across Android versions. # Test: Search for conditional Android version checks around `enableEdgeToEdge`. rg --type kotlin -A 3 -B 3 'enableEdgeToEdge' app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/MainActivity.ktLength of output: 711
app/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_foreground.xml (1)
1-30: Review of vector drawableic_launcher_foreground.xml:The XML structure is well-formed and correctly defines a vector drawable with appropriate dimensions and viewport settings. The use of a linear gradient within the icon adds visual depth. Ensure that the colors used in the gradient are consistent with the app's theme and are accessible under different lighting conditions.
Additionally, consider optimizing the path data if possible to reduce complexity and improve rendering performance on lower-end devices.
app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Theme.kt (1)
35-57: Review ofStencilMobileThemefunction:The theming function intelligently handles both light and dark themes and supports dynamic coloring based on the system settings, which is a modern approach for Android apps targeting Android 12 and above. The conditional logic for selecting the color scheme is clear and concise.
Consider adding error handling or logging to capture potential issues when fetching the dynamic color schemes, especially since this feature relies on system-level support that might not always behave as expected.
stencilmobile/build.gradle.kts (1)
6-62: Mismatched Versions Detected:The Kotlin compiler extension version (
1.5.1) does not match the Compose library version (1.2.1). This mismatch can lead to runtime issues due to incompatibility.
kotlinCompilerExtensionVersion = "1.5.1"implementation("androidx.compose.material3:material3:1.2.1")Please align the versions to avoid potential runtime issues.
Analysis chain
Review of
build.gradle.ktsconfiguration:The build script is well-organized, specifying necessary plugins, Android SDK versions, and build options. The use of version aliases via
libsis a best practice to manage dependency versions centrally, which enhances maintainability.However, ensure that the Kotlin compiler extension version for Compose (
1.5.1) matches the Compose library version used in the dependencies (1.2.1), as mismatches can lead to runtime issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify matching versions for Kotlin compiler extension and Compose library. # Test: Search for version discrepancies in the build script. rg 'kotlinCompilerExtensionVersion|material3:material3' stencilmobile/build.gradle.ktsLength of output: 202
app/build.gradle.kts (1)
6-50: Review of Android Configuration Block:
- Namespace and SDK Versions: The namespace and SDK versions are appropriately set for a modern Android application. Using SDK 34 aligns with current standards.
- Default Config: The configuration includes standard settings such as
applicationId,minSdk,targetSdk,versionCode, andversionName. The inclusion oftestInstrumentationRunnerindicates preparedness for automated testing, which is good practice.- Build Types: The release configuration disables minification (
isMinifyEnabled = false) which is typical for initial project setups but should be enabled later for production builds to optimize performance and security.- Compile and Kotlin Options: Setting both Java and Kotlin to target version 1.8 is consistent and ensures compatibility.
- Compose Options: Enabling Jetpack Compose and setting the compiler extension version are forward-thinking choices, aligning with modern Android UI development practices.
Overall, the configuration is robust, but consider enabling minification for release builds in the future.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jaris excluded by!**/*.jar
Files selected for processing (42)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .idea/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- .idea/.name (1 hunks)
- .idea/compiler.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/deploymentTargetSelector.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/gradle.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/kotlinc.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/migrations.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/misc.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/vcs.xml (1 hunks)
- app/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- app/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- app/proguard-rules.pro (1 hunks)
- app/src/androidTest/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleInstrumentedTest.kt (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/MainActivity.kt (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Color.kt (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Theme.kt (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Type.kt (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_background.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_foreground.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/mipmap-anydpi-v26/ic_launcher.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/mipmap-anydpi-v26/ic_launcher_round.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/values/colors.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/values/strings.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/values/themes.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/xml/backup_rules.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/xml/data_extraction_rules.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt (1 hunks)
- build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- gradle.properties (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (1 hunks)
- gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties (1 hunks)
- gradlew (1 hunks)
- gradlew.bat (1 hunks)
- settings.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/proguard-rules.pro (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/src/androidTest/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleInstrumentedTest.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1 hunks)
- stencilmobile/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (26)
- .gitignore
- .idea/.gitignore
- .idea/.name
- .idea/compiler.xml
- .idea/deploymentTargetSelector.xml
- .idea/gradle.xml
- .idea/kotlinc.xml
- .idea/migrations.xml
- .idea/misc.xml
- .idea/vcs.xml
- app/.gitignore
- app/proguard-rules.pro
- app/src/androidTest/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleInstrumentedTest.kt
- app/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ui/theme/Color.kt
- app/src/main/res/mipmap-anydpi-v26/ic_launcher.xml
- app/src/main/res/values/colors.xml
- app/src/main/res/xml/backup_rules.xml
- app/src/main/res/xml/data_extraction_rules.xml
- app/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt
- gradle.properties
- gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties
- gradlew
- stencilmobile/.gitignore
- stencilmobile/proguard-rules.pro
- stencilmobile/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml
- stencilmobile/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt
Additional comments not posted (13)
app/src/main/res/values/strings.xml (1)
1-3: String resource correctly defined.The
app_namestring is properly defined in the XML file and follows Android conventions.app/src/main/res/values/themes.xml (1)
1-5: Theme configuration is appropriate.The theme
Theme.StencilMobileis correctly set up to inherit fromandroid:Theme.Material.Light.NoActionBar, which is suitable for modern Android applications that do not require an action bar.app/src/main/res/mipmap-anydpi-v26/ic_launcher_round.xml (1)
1-6: Adaptive icon setup is correct, but verify drawable resources.The adaptive icon configuration is correctly defined with appropriate layers for background, foreground, and monochrome. However, ensure that the drawable resources (
ic_launcher_background,ic_launcher_foreground) referenced here actually exist in your drawable directories.Verification successful
Adaptive icon setup is correct and drawable resources are verified.
The adaptive icon configuration is correctly defined with appropriate layers for background, foreground, and monochrome. The drawable resources (
ic_launcher_background,ic_launcher_foreground) referenced in the XML file exist in the project.
app/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_background.xmlapp/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_foreground.xmlScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of drawable resources used in adaptive icons. # Test: Search for the drawable resources. Expect: At least one occurrence of each resource. fd "ic_launcher_background.xml" && fd "ic_launcher_foreground.xml"Length of output: 169
build.gradle.kts (1)
1-11: Build configuration setup looks good, but verify plugin aliases and dependencies.The build script is well-organized with clear separation of dependencies and plugin configurations. However, ensure that the plugin aliases (
libs.plugins.android.application,libs.plugins.jetbrains.kotlin.android,libs.plugins.android.library) and the Google Services classpath dependency are compatible with the rest of your project setup.Verification successful
Build configuration setup is verified and correct.
The plugin aliases (
libs.plugins.android.application,libs.plugins.jetbrains.kotlin.android,libs.plugins.android.library) and the Google Services classpath dependency (com.google.gms:google-services:4.4.2) are present and used in the project.
libs.plugins.android.application: Found inbuild.gradle.ktsandapp/build.gradle.kts.libs.plugins.jetbrains.kotlin.android: Found instencilmobile/build.gradle.kts,build.gradle.kts, andapp/build.gradle.kts.libs.plugins.android.library: Found instencilmobile/build.gradle.ktsandbuild.gradle.kts.com.google.gms:google-services: Found inbuild.gradle.kts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and compatibility of plugins and dependencies in the build script. # Test: Search for the plugin usage and classpath dependency in the project. Expect: At least one occurrence of each alias and dependency. rg "libs.plugins.android.application" && rg "libs.plugins.jetbrains.kotlin.android" && rg "libs.plugins.android.library" && rg "com.google.gms:google-services"Length of output: 731
settings.gradle.kts (3)
1-13: Review of plugin management configuration.The configuration correctly sets up the plugin management with specific groups for Android and Google dependencies. This is a typical setup for Android projects using Gradle Kotlin DSL and should work without issues.
14-20: Review of dependency resolution management.Setting
RepositoriesMode.FAIL_ON_PROJECT_REPOSensures that only the repositories defined here are used, which is a good security practice. The repositories listed (Google and Maven Central) are standard for Android development.
22-24: Project structure setup.The root project name is set to "Stencil Mobile" and includes two modules:
:appand:stencilmobile. Ensure that these modules are correctly configured in their respectivebuild.gradle.ktsfiles to avoid build issues.Would you like me to review the module configuration files for
:appand:stencilmobile?Verification successful
Modules are correctly configured.
The
build.gradle.ktsfiles for both:appand:stencilmobilemodules are properly configured with necessary plugins, Android settings, Kotlin options, build features, and dependencies. No issues were found.
./app/build.gradle.kts./stencilmobile/build.gradle.ktsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify module configuration files. # Test: Search for the module configuration files. Expect: Files should exist. fd --type file 'build.gradle.kts' --exec rg --files-with-matches 'app|stencilmobile'Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the module configuration files. # Display the contents of the build.gradle.kts files for the app and stencilmobile modules. cat ./app/build.gradle.kts cat ./stencilmobile/build.gradle.ktsLength of output: 3910
app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1)
1-28: Review of AndroidManifest configuration.The manifest is correctly configured with essential settings like backup rules, icons, and themes. The activity is set to be exported, which is necessary for apps targeting Android 12 and above. The intent filter is correctly set to make the MainActivity the launcher activity.
app/build.gradle.kts (2)
1-4: Review of Plugin Configuration:The plugin configuration uses aliases from a presumably centralized dependency management system (
libs.plugins). This approach enhances maintainability by centralizing version control and dependency management.
52-70: Review of Dependencies Configuration:
- Implementation Dependencies: The project uses a range of Jetpack Compose and AndroidX libraries, which are suitable for a modern Android application. The use of a BOM (Bill of Materials) for Compose dependencies ensures consistent versioning across Compose components.
- Test Dependencies: The inclusion of JUnit and Espresso alongside Compose testing libraries indicates a strong emphasis on testing, which is excellent for maintaining high code quality.
- Debug Dependencies: Including tooling for UI debugging and testing in the debug build is a good practice, as it aids developers during the development phase without impacting the release builds.
The dependencies are well-chosen and structured, promoting a clean and maintainable codebase.
gradle/libs.versions.toml (1)
1-38: Review of Dependency Versions and Libraries:
- Version Definitions: The versions specified for Android Gradle Plugin, Kotlin, and various AndroidX libraries are up-to-date, which is crucial for accessing the latest features and security fixes.
- Library Definitions: The structured approach to defining library dependencies with version references ensures that all modules use consistent versions, which reduces the risk of dependency conflicts.
- Plugin Definitions: The mapping of plugins with version references to their respective IDs ensures consistency and ease of updates.
This file is well-organized and follows best practices for dependency management in large projects.
gradlew.bat (1)
1-89: Review of Gradle Wrapper Script for Windows (gradlew.bat):
- Copyright and License Notices: These are appropriately included and respect software licensing requirements.
- Environment Checks: The script includes comprehensive checks for the JAVA_HOME environment variable and the presence of a Java executable, which are crucial for the correct operation of Gradle.
- Error Handling: The script robustly handles errors related to Java configuration, providing clear error messages and guidance for users to resolve configuration issues.
This script is well-written and adheres to best practices for batch scripting in a Windows environment.
app/src/main/res/drawable/ic_launcher_background.xml (1)
1-170: Review of Vector Drawable for App Launcher Background:
- XML Structure and Syntax: The XML is well-formed, and the syntax is correct. The use of vector graphics is appropriate for scalable app icons.
- Design Elements: The paths and colors used are consistent and visually structured. The use of transparency and stroke settings enhances the visual appeal without compromising performance.
This drawable resource is efficiently designed and suitable for its intended use as an app launcher background.
| /** | ||
| * Instrumented test, which will execute on an Android device. | ||
| * | ||
| * See [testing documentation](http://d.android.com/tools/testing). | ||
| */ | ||
| @RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class) | ||
| class ExampleInstrumentedTest { | ||
| @Test | ||
| fun useAppContext() { | ||
| // Context of the app under test. | ||
| val appContext = InstrumentationRegistry.getInstrumentation().targetContext | ||
| assertEquals("com.example.stencilmobile.test", appContext.packageName) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of ExampleInstrumentedTest.
The test method useAppContext() correctly retrieves the application context and asserts the package name. However, the package name in the assertion (com.example.stencilmobile.test) should match the actual package name of the application. This might be a mistake unless explicitly intended for a test configuration.
- assertEquals("com.example.stencilmobile.test", appContext.packageName)
+ assertEquals("com.samagra.stencilmobile", appContext.packageName)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /** | |
| * Instrumented test, which will execute on an Android device. | |
| * | |
| * See [testing documentation](http://d.android.com/tools/testing). | |
| */ | |
| @RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class) | |
| class ExampleInstrumentedTest { | |
| @Test | |
| fun useAppContext() { | |
| // Context of the app under test. | |
| val appContext = InstrumentationRegistry.getInstrumentation().targetContext | |
| assertEquals("com.example.stencilmobile.test", appContext.packageName) | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Instrumented test, which will execute on an Android device. | |
| * | |
| * See [testing documentation](http://d.android.com/tools/testing). | |
| */ | |
| @RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class) | |
| class ExampleInstrumentedTest { | |
| @Test | |
| fun useAppContext() { | |
| // Context of the app under test. | |
| val appContext = InstrumentationRegistry.getInstrumentation().targetContext | |
| assertEquals("com.samagra.stencilmobile", appContext.packageName) | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (20)
- .idea/deploymentTargetSelector.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/gradle.xml (1 hunks)
- .idea/inspectionProfiles/Project_Default.xml (1 hunks)
- app/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/arrow_next.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/baseline_assignment_ind_24.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/bird.xml (1 hunks)
- app/src/main/res/drawable/top_img.xml (1 hunks)
- gradle/libs.versions.toml (1 hunks)
- jitpack.yml (1 hunks)
- settings.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/proguard-rules.pro (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/androidTest/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleInstrumentedTest.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CustomScreenMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- .idea/gradle.xml
- app/src/main/res/drawable/arrow_next.xml
- stencilmobiles/.gitignore
- stencilmobiles/proguard-rules.pro
- stencilmobiles/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml
- stencilmobiles/src/test/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleUnitTest.kt
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- .idea/deploymentTargetSelector.xml
- app/build.gradle.kts
- app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml
- gradle/libs.versions.toml
- settings.gradle.kts
Additional context used
yamllint
jitpack.yml
[error] 2-2: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Additional comments not posted (40)
app/src/main/res/drawable/baseline_assignment_ind_24.xml (1)
1-5: LGTM!The vector drawable is well-formed and correctly defined.
stencilmobiles/src/androidTest/java/com/samagra/stencilmobile/ExampleInstrumentedTest.kt (1)
22-22: Verify the package name in the assertion.Ensure that the package name
"com.example.stencilmobile.test"matches the actual package name of the app under test..idea/inspectionProfiles/Project_Default.xml (9)
4-7: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewAnnotationInFunctionWithParametersis correct and consistent.
8-11: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewApiLevelMustBeValidis correct and consistent.
12-15: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewDimensionRespectsLimitis correct and consistent.
16-19: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewFontScaleMustBeGreaterThanZerois correct and consistent.
20-23: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewMultipleParameterProvidersis correct and consistent.
24-27: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewMustBeTopLevelFunctionis correct and consistent.
28-31: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewNeedsComposableAnnotationis correct and consistent.
32-35: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewNotSupportedInUnitTestFilesis correct and consistent.
36-39: LGTM!The configuration for
PreviewPickerAnnotationis correct and consistent.stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (14)
1-5: LGTM!The plugins section is appropriate and correctly configured.
7-9: LGTM!The namespace and compileSdk are correctly configured.
11-16: LGTM!The defaultConfig section is correctly configured.
18-25: LGTM!The buildTypes section is correctly configured.
27-30: LGTM!The compileOptions section is correctly configured.
31-33: LGTM!The kotlinOptions section is correctly configured.
34-36: LGTM!The buildFeatures section is correctly configured.
37-39: LGTM!The composeOptions section is correctly configured.
44-55: LGTM!The implementation dependencies are appropriate and correctly configured.
48-48: LGTM!The testImplementation dependencies are appropriate and correctly configured.
52-53: LGTM!The debugImplementation dependencies are appropriate and correctly configured.
56-59: LGTM!The androidTestImplementation dependencies are appropriate and correctly configured.
64-74: LGTM!The publications section is correctly configured.
76-79: LGTM!The repositories section is correctly configured.
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CustomScreenMolecule.kt (13)
41-59: Review function parameters and defaults.The function parameters are well-defined with sensible defaults. Ensure that all optional parameters are used correctly within the function.
61-67: Review layout and arrangement.The
Columncomposable is used correctly with appropriate modifiers for layout and alignment.
68-82: Review top image handling.The top image resource handling is correct. The use of
painterResourceand modifiers is appropriate.
95-101: Review title text styling.The title text styling is appropriate, with sensible use of font size, weight, and color.
103-107: Review result box handling.The result box data handling is correct, with appropriate usage of the
ResultBoxcomposable.
110-116: Review subtitle text styling.The subtitle text styling is appropriate, with sensible use of font size, color, and alignment.
119-137: Review bottom image handling.The bottom image resource handling is correct. The use of
painterResourceand modifiers is appropriate.
139-153: Review button handling.The button configuration and additional buttons are handled correctly with appropriate usage of the
CustomButtoncomposable.
157-189: ReviewResultBoxcomposable function.The
ResultBoxcomposable function is well-defined with appropriate usage of layout and UI elements. The result rows and dividers are used correctly.
191-219: ReviewResultRowcomposable function.The
ResultRowcomposable function is well-defined with appropriate usage of layout and UI elements. The text and divider elements are used correctly.
223-245: ReviewCustomButtoncomposable function.The
CustomButtoncomposable function is well-defined with appropriate usage of layout and UI elements. The button and text elements are used correctly.
248-255: ReviewResultBoxDatadata class.The
ResultBoxDatadata class is well-defined with appropriate properties and types.
257-261: ReviewButtonConfigdata class.The
ButtonConfigdata class is well-defined with appropriate properties and types.app/src/main/res/drawable/bird.xml (1)
1-153: Review vector drawable elements.The vector drawable elements are well-defined with appropriate path data and attributes. Ensure that the drawable is used correctly in the application.
app/src/main/res/drawable/top_img.xml (1)
1-38: Review vector drawable elements.The vector drawable elements are well-defined with appropriate path data and attributes. Ensure that the drawable is used correctly in the application.
| jdk: | ||
| -openjdk17 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a new line character at the end of the file.
Ensure that the file ends with a new line character to adhere to best practices.
- -openjdk17
+ -openjdk17
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| jdk: | |
| -openjdk17 | |
| jdk: | |
| -openjdk17 | |
Tools
yamllint
[error] 2-2: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
| progress?.let { | ||
| LinearProgressIndicator( | ||
| progress = { it }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.height(6.dp), | ||
| color = Color.Blue, | ||
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix progress indicator lambda usage.
The progress indicator should directly use the progress value instead of a lambda.
- progress = { it },
+ progress = it,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| progress?.let { | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = { it }, | |
| modifier = Modifier.height(6.dp), | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | |
| ) | |
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp)) | |
| } | |
| progress?.let { | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = it, | |
| modifier = Modifier.height(6.dp), | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | |
| ) | |
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp)) | |
| } |
| @Composable | ||
| fun ProgressLineBar(progress: Float) { | ||
| Row( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(vertical = 26.dp) | ||
| .padding(16.dp), | ||
| verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically, | ||
| horizontalArrangement = Arrangement.SpaceBetween | ||
| ) { | ||
| LinearProgressIndicator( | ||
| progress = { progress }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.weight(1f), | ||
| color = Color.Blue, | ||
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | ||
| ) | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = "${(progress * 100).toInt()}%", | ||
| fontSize = 14.sp, | ||
| color = Color.Blue, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(start = 8.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the syntax error in LinearProgressIndicator.
The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
- LinearProgressIndicator(
- progress = { progress },
+ LinearProgressIndicator(
+ progress = progress,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Composable | |
| fun ProgressLineBar(progress: Float) { | |
| Row( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(vertical = 26.dp) | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically, | |
| horizontalArrangement = Arrangement.SpaceBetween | |
| ) { | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = { progress }, | |
| modifier = Modifier.weight(1f), | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | |
| ) | |
| Text( | |
| text = "${(progress * 100).toInt()}%", | |
| fontSize = 14.sp, | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| modifier = Modifier.padding(start = 8.dp) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| @Composable | |
| fun ProgressLineBar(progress: Float) { | |
| Row( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(vertical = 26.dp) | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalAlignment = Alignment.CenterVertically, | |
| horizontalArrangement = Arrangement.SpaceBetween | |
| ) { | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = progress, | |
| modifier = Modifier.weight(1f), | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | |
| ) | |
| Text( | |
| text = "${(progress * 100).toInt()}%", | |
| fontSize = 14.sp, | |
| color = Color.Blue, | |
| modifier = Modifier.padding(start = 8.dp) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } |
| @Composable | ||
| fun ReadingPassageMolecule( | ||
| passage: String, | ||
| progress: Float?= null, | ||
| readWordsCount: Int, | ||
| fontSize: TextUnit, | ||
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | ||
| imageRes: Int? = null, | ||
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | ||
| imageModifier: Modifier? = null | ||
| ) { | ||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxSize() | ||
| .padding(16.dp), | ||
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(5.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| progress?.let { | ||
| ProgressLineBar(progress = it) | ||
| } | ||
| PassageDisplay( | ||
| passage = passage, | ||
| readWordsCount = readWordsCount, | ||
| fontSize = fontSize, | ||
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | ||
| imageRes = imageRes, | ||
| imageAlignment = imageAlignment, | ||
| imageModifier = imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- imageModifier: Modifier? = null
+ imageModifier: Modifier = ModifierCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Composable | |
| fun ReadingPassageMolecule( | |
| passage: String, | |
| progress: Float?= null, | |
| readWordsCount: Int, | |
| fontSize: TextUnit, | |
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | |
| imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | |
| imageModifier: Modifier? = null | |
| ) { | |
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxSize() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(5.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| progress?.let { | |
| ProgressLineBar(progress = it) | |
| } | |
| PassageDisplay( | |
| passage = passage, | |
| readWordsCount = readWordsCount, | |
| fontSize = fontSize, | |
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | |
| imageRes = imageRes, | |
| imageAlignment = imageAlignment, | |
| imageModifier = imageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| @Composable | |
| fun ReadingPassageMolecule( | |
| passage: String, | |
| progress: Float?= null, | |
| readWordsCount: Int, | |
| fontSize: TextUnit, | |
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | |
| imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | |
| imageModifier: Modifier = Modifier | |
| ) { | |
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxSize() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(5.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| progress?.let { | |
| ProgressLineBar(progress = it) | |
| } | |
| PassageDisplay( | |
| passage = passage, | |
| readWordsCount = readWordsCount, | |
| fontSize = fontSize, | |
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | |
| imageRes = imageRes, | |
| imageAlignment = imageAlignment, | |
| imageModifier = imageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } |
| @Composable | ||
| fun PassageDisplay( | ||
| passage: String, | ||
| readWordsCount: Int, | ||
| fontSize: TextUnit, | ||
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | ||
| imageRes: Int? = null, | ||
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | ||
| imageModifier: Modifier? = null | ||
| ) { | ||
| val words = passage.split(" ") | ||
| val readWords = words.take(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | ||
| val unreadWords = words.drop(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | ||
|
|
||
| LazyColumn( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxSize() | ||
| .padding(16.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| item { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Blue, fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold)) { | ||
| append(readWords) | ||
| if (readWords.isNotEmpty()) append(" ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Gray)) { | ||
| append(unreadWords) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| textAlign = TextAlign.Start, | ||
| fontSize = fontSize, | ||
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| imageRes?.let { | ||
| item { | ||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth() | ||
| ) { | ||
| if (imageModifier != null) { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | ||
| modifier = imageModifier.align(imageAlignment) | ||
| ) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .width(150.dp) | ||
| .height(150.dp) | ||
| .align(imageAlignment) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- imageModifier: Modifier? = null
+ imageModifier: Modifier = ModifierCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Composable | |
| fun PassageDisplay( | |
| passage: String, | |
| readWordsCount: Int, | |
| fontSize: TextUnit, | |
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | |
| imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | |
| imageModifier: Modifier? = null | |
| ) { | |
| val words = passage.split(" ") | |
| val readWords = words.take(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | |
| val unreadWords = words.drop(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | |
| LazyColumn( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxSize() | |
| .padding(16.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| item { | |
| Text( | |
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | |
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Blue, fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold)) { | |
| append(readWords) | |
| if (readWords.isNotEmpty()) append(" ") | |
| } | |
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Gray)) { | |
| append(unreadWords) | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| textAlign = TextAlign.Start, | |
| fontSize = fontSize, | |
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| imageRes?.let { | |
| item { | |
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth() | |
| ) { | |
| if (imageModifier != null) { | |
| Image( | |
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | |
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | |
| modifier = imageModifier.align(imageAlignment) | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| Image( | |
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | |
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .width(150.dp) | |
| .height(150.dp) | |
| .align(imageAlignment) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| @Composable | |
| fun PassageDisplay( | |
| passage: String, | |
| readWordsCount: Int, | |
| fontSize: TextUnit, | |
| lineHeight: TextUnit, | |
| imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | |
| imageModifier: Modifier = Modifier | |
| ) { | |
| val words = passage.split(" ") | |
| val readWords = words.take(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | |
| val unreadWords = words.drop(readWordsCount).joinToString(" ") | |
| LazyColumn( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxSize() | |
| .padding(16.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| item { | |
| Text( | |
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | |
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Blue, fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold)) { | |
| append(readWords) | |
| if (readWords.isNotEmpty()) append(" ") | |
| } | |
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = Color.Gray)) { | |
| append(unreadWords) | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| textAlign = TextAlign.Start, | |
| fontSize = fontSize, | |
| lineHeight = lineHeight, | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| imageRes?.let { | |
| item { | |
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth() | |
| ) { | |
| if (imageModifier != null) { | |
| Image( | |
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | |
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | |
| modifier = imageModifier.align(imageAlignment) | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| Image( | |
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | |
| contentDescription = "Optional Image", | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .width(150.dp) | |
| .height(150.dp) | |
| .align(imageAlignment) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (1)
110-115: LGTM!The data class
PassageModelis well-defined with appropriate default values.stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (7)
145-177: LGTM!The function
ResultBoxis well-defined and follows best practices.
179-208: LGTM!The function
ResultRowis well-defined and follows best practices.
210-233: LGTM!The function
CustomButtonis well-defined and follows best practices.
236-243: LGTM!The data class
ResultBoxDatais well-defined with appropriate properties.
245-250: LGTM!The data class
ButtonConfigis well-defined with appropriate default values.
251-257: LGTM!The data class
TopInstructionModelis well-defined with appropriate properties.
259-263: LGTM!The data class
BottomInstructionModelis well-defined with appropriate properties.
| modifier = (passageStyle.imageModifier?.align(passageStyle.imageAlignment) ?: Modifier | ||
| .width(150.dp) | ||
| .height(150.dp)) | ||
| .align(passageStyle.imageAlignment) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- modifier = (passageStyle.imageModifier?.align(passageStyle.imageAlignment) ?: Modifier
+ modifier = (passageStyle.imageModifier?.align(passageStyle.imageAlignment) ?: Modifier
- .width(150.dp)
- .height(150.dp))
+ .width(150.dp)
+ .height(150.dp))Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| val fontSize: TextUnit = 40.sp, | ||
| val lineHeight: TextUnit = 70.sp, | ||
| val imageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | ||
| val imageModifier: Modifier? = null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- val imageModifier: Modifier? = null
+ val imageModifier: Modifier = ModifierCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| val imageModifier: Modifier? = null | |
| val imageModifier: Modifier = Modifier |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | ||
| progress = { it }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the syntax error in LinearProgressIndicator.
The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
- LinearProgressIndicator(
- progress = { it },
+ LinearProgressIndicator(
+ progress = it,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = { it }, | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = it, |
|
|
||
| data class TopInstructionStyle( | ||
| val backgroundColor: Color? = Color.White, | ||
| val topImageModifier: Modifier? = null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- val topImageModifier: Modifier? = null
+ val topImageModifier: Modifier = ModifierCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| val topImageModifier: Modifier? = null, | |
| val topImageModifier: Modifier = Modifier |
|
|
||
| topInstructionModel.progress?.let { | ||
| LinearProgressIndicator( | ||
| progress = { it }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the syntax error in LinearProgressIndicator.
The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
- LinearProgressIndicator(
- progress = { it },
+ LinearProgressIndicator(
+ progress = it,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| progress = { it }, | |
| LinearProgressIndicator( | |
| progress = it, |
|
|
||
| data class BottomInstructionStyle( | ||
| val bottomImageAlignment: Alignment.Horizontal = Alignment.End, | ||
| val bottomImageModifier: Modifier? = null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve the usage of Modifier.
Using Modifier? is unconventional. Consider using a default Modifier instead for better readability and maintainability.
- val bottomImageModifier: Modifier? = null
+ val bottomImageModifier: Modifier = ModifierCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1)
39-39: Remove commented-out code.Remove the commented-out code for elevation to improve readability.
-// elevation = CardDefaults.cardElevation(defaultElevation = 3.dp),stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (3)
158-189: Avoid redundant padding.The padding is applied twice, which might be redundant.
- .padding(16.dp)
191-220: Avoid redundant padding.The padding is applied twice, which might be redundant.
- .padding(vertical = 8.dp)
223-250: Avoid redundant padding.The padding is applied twice, which might be redundant.
- .padding(vertical = 8.dp)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/GenericInputFieldMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/OtpInputMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/res/drawable/compress.xml (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/res/drawable/expand.xml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/res/drawable/compress.xml
- stencilmobiles/src/main/res/drawable/expand.xml
Additional comments not posted (25)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (2)
1-1: Ensure proper package naming conventions.The package name
com.samagra.stencilmobiles.moleculesshould follow standard naming conventions and be consistent across the project.
9-24: LGTM! EnsureCardAttributesandCardStylesare defined.The function implementation looks good. Ensure that
CardAttributesandCardStylesare correctly defined and imported.Verification successful
Verified:
CardAttributesandCardStylesare correctly defined and used in the same package asCardListMolecule.kt.
CardAttributesandCardStylesare defined as data classes inCardMolecule.kt.- These classes are used in
CardListMolecule.ktwithout import statements, indicating they are in the same package.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles`. # Test: Search for the definitions of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles`. Expect: Definitions to be found. rg --type kotlin 'class CardAttributes' rg --type kotlin 'class CardStyles'Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import statements for `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles` in `CardListMolecule.kt`. # Test: Search for the import statements of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles` in `CardListMolecule.kt`. Expect: Import statements to be found. rg --type kotlin 'import .*CardAttributes' stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt rg --type kotlin 'import .*CardStyles' stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.ktLength of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the content of `CardListMolecule.kt` and check for the usage of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles`. # Output the content of the `CardListMolecule.kt` file. cat stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt # Search for the usage of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles` in the `CardListMolecule.kt` file. rg --type kotlin 'CardAttributes' stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt rg --type kotlin 'CardStyles' stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.ktLength of output: 1127
stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (4)
7-40: Ensure android configurations are correct.The android configurations appear to be correct. Verify the namespace, compileSdk, minSdk, and other settings.
Verification successful
Android configurations are correct.
The android configurations in the
build.gradle.ktsfile are correctly set as per the review comment.
namespace = "com.samagra.stencilmobiles"compileSdk = 34minSdk = 24Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the android configurations. # Test: Search for the android configurations. Expect: Correct values to be found. rg --type kts 'namespace = "com.samagra.stencilmobiles"' rg --type kts 'compileSdk = 34' rg --type kts 'minSdk = 24'Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the android configurations. # Find all Kotlin script files and search for the specific configurations. fd -e kts -x rg 'namespace = "com.samagra.stencilmobiles"' {} fd -e kts -x rg 'compileSdk = 34' {} fd -e kts -x rg 'minSdk = 24' {}Length of output: 268
42-66: Ensure dependencies are correctly declared.The dependencies are correctly declared. Verify that the aliases used for the dependencies are defined in the
libsfile.
1-5: Ensure plugins are correctly declared.The plugins are correctly declared. Verify that the aliases used for the plugins are defined in the
libsfile.
68-85: Ensure publishing settings are correct.The publishing settings appear to be correct. Verify the groupId, artifactId, version, and repository URL.
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/GenericInputFieldMolecule.kt (2)
1-1: Ensure proper package naming conventions.The package name
com.samagra.stencilmobiles.moleculesshould follow standard naming conventions and be consistent across the project.
28-88: LGTM! EnsureInputTypeis defined.The function implementation looks good. Ensure that
InputTypeis correctly defined and imported.Verification successful
Verification Successful:
InputTypeis correctly defined.The
InputTypeenum class is defined within the same file as theGenericInputFieldMoleculefunction, ensuring it is correctly accessible and there are no issues with its definition or import.
- Location:
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/GenericInputFieldMolecule.ktScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and correctness of `InputType`. # Test: Search for the definition of `InputType`. Expect: Definition to be found. rg --type kotlin 'enum class InputType'Length of output: 159
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (3)
36-40: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- imageModifier: Modifier? = null + imageModifier: Modifier = Modifier
58-59: Fix the syntax error inLinearProgressIndicator.The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
- LinearProgressIndicator( - progress = { progress }, + LinearProgressIndicator( + progress = progress,
158-163: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- val imageModifier: Modifier? = null, + val imageModifier: Modifier = Modifier,stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1)
152-176: LGTM!The data class is well-defined and follows best practices.
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1)
163-174: LGTM!The data class
ProfileCardStylesis well-defined and follows best practices.stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt (6)
201-206: LGTM!The data class
LoginCommonModelis well-defined and follows best practices.
208-216: LGTM!The data class
LoginCommonStyleis well-defined and follows best practices.
218-228: LGTM!The data class
LoginModelis well-defined and follows best practices.
230-238: LGTM!The data class
OtpModelis well-defined and follows best practices.
240-245: LGTM!The data class
LoginStyleis well-defined and follows best practices.
247-251: LGTM!The data class
OtpStyleis well-defined and follows best practices.stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (6)
42-45: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- .background(topInstructionStyle.backgroundColor ?: Color.White), + .background(topInstructionStyle.backgroundColor ?: Color.White)
66-66: Fix the syntax error inLinearProgressIndicator.The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
- progress = { it }, + progress = it,
57-57: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- modifier = topInstructionStyle.topImageModifier ?: Modifier + modifier = topInstructionStyle.topImageModifier ?: Modifier
114-114: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- modifier = bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageModifier.align( + modifier = bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageModifier.align(
282-284: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- val topImageModifier: Modifier? = null + val topImageModifier: Modifier = Modifier
292-292: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.- val bottomImageModifier: Modifier? = null + val bottomImageModifier: Modifier = Modifier
| passageStyle: PassageStyle, | ||
| scoreColorMapping: Map<Int, Color>, | ||
| ) { | ||
| val wordWithValue = remember { passageModel.jsonArray?.let { parseJsonArray(it) } } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null values in passageModel.
Ensure that passageModel.jsonArray is not null before parsing it.
- val wordWithValue = remember { passageModel.jsonArray?.let { parseJsonArray(it) } }
+ val wordWithValue = remember { passageModel.jsonArray?.let { parseJsonArray(it) } ?: emptyList() }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| val wordWithValue = remember { passageModel.jsonArray?.let { parseJsonArray(it) } } | |
| val wordWithValue = remember { passageModel.jsonArray?.let { parseJsonArray(it) } ?: emptyList() } |
| data class PassageModel( | ||
| val passage: String, | ||
| val progress: Float? = null, | ||
| val jsonArray: String? = null, | ||
| val imageRes: Int? = null, | ||
| val readWordsCount: Int? = 0, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use null as the default value for readWordsCount.
Using null as the default value for readWordsCount indicates that it is optional.
- val readWordsCount: Int? = 0,
+ val readWordsCount: Int? = null,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| data class PassageModel( | |
| val passage: String, | |
| val progress: Float? = null, | |
| val jsonArray: String? = null, | |
| val imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| val readWordsCount: Int? = 0, | |
| ) | |
| data class PassageModel( | |
| val passage: String, | |
| val progress: Float? = null, | |
| val jsonArray: String? = null, | |
| val imageRes: Int? = null, | |
| val readWordsCount: Int? = null, | |
| ) |
| fun parseJsonArray(jsonArray: String): List<Pair<String, Int>> { | ||
| val jsonElement = Json.parseToJsonElement(jsonArray) | ||
| val jsonArray = jsonElement.jsonArray | ||
| return jsonArray.map { | ||
| val jsonObject = it.jsonObject | ||
| val word = jsonObject.keys.first() | ||
| val value = jsonObject[word]?.jsonPrimitive?.int ?: 0 | ||
| Pair(word, value) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for potential parsing errors.
Ensure that the function handles potential parsing errors gracefully.
- val jsonElement = Json.parseToJsonElement(jsonArray)
- val jsonArray = jsonElement.jsonArray
- return jsonArray.map {
- val jsonObject = it.jsonObject
- val word = jsonObject.keys.first()
- val value = jsonObject[word]?.jsonPrimitive?.int ?: 0
- Pair(word, value)
- }
+ return try {
+ val jsonElement = Json.parseToJsonElement(jsonArray)
+ val jsonArray = jsonElement.jsonArray
+ jsonArray.map {
+ val jsonObject = it.jsonObject
+ val word = jsonObject.keys.first()
+ val value = jsonObject[word]?.jsonPrimitive?.int ?: 0
+ Pair(word, value)
+ }
+ } catch (e: Exception) {
+ emptyList()
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fun parseJsonArray(jsonArray: String): List<Pair<String, Int>> { | |
| val jsonElement = Json.parseToJsonElement(jsonArray) | |
| val jsonArray = jsonElement.jsonArray | |
| return jsonArray.map { | |
| val jsonObject = it.jsonObject | |
| val word = jsonObject.keys.first() | |
| val value = jsonObject[word]?.jsonPrimitive?.int ?: 0 | |
| Pair(word, value) | |
| } | |
| fun parseJsonArray(jsonArray: String): List<Pair<String, Int>> { | |
| return try { | |
| val jsonElement = Json.parseToJsonElement(jsonArray) | |
| val jsonArray = jsonElement.jsonArray | |
| jsonArray.map { | |
| val jsonObject = it.jsonObject | |
| val word = jsonObject.keys.first() | |
| val value = jsonObject[word]?.jsonPrimitive?.int ?: 0 | |
| Pair(word, value) | |
| } | |
| } catch (e: Exception) { | |
| emptyList() | |
| } | |
| } |
| @Composable | ||
| fun ProfileCardMolecule( | ||
| profileCardAttributes: ProfileCardAttributes, | ||
| profileCardStyles: ProfileCardStyles = ProfileCardStyles() | ||
| ) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enhance accessibility by adding content descriptions.
Ensure that all UI components, especially images and icons, have appropriate content descriptions for accessibility.
fun ProfileCardMolecule(
profileCardAttributes: ProfileCardAttributes,
profileCardStyles: ProfileCardStyles = ProfileCardStyles()
) {
Card(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(16.dp)
.border(
border = BorderStroke(
width = 4.dp,
brush = Brush.linearGradient(colors = profileCardStyles.gradientColors)
),
shape = RoundedCornerShape(8.dp)
),
colors = CardDefaults.cardColors(Color.White),
elevation = CardDefaults.cardElevation(8.dp)
) {
Column(modifier = Modifier.padding(16.dp)) {
profileCardAttributes.name?.let {
Text(
text = it,
style = MaterialTheme.typography.headlineSmall.copy(
brush = Brush.linearGradient(colors = profileCardStyles.gradientColors)
),
color = Color.Transparent,
fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold,
modifier = Modifier
.padding(bottom = 3.dp)
.align(Alignment.CenterHorizontally)
)
}
Divider(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.height(2.dp)
.background(brush = Brush.linearGradient(colors = profileCardStyles.gradientColors))
)
Row(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(start = 10.dp, end = 10.dp)
) {
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.padding(top = 20.dp)
) {
Text(
text = buildAnnotatedString {
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) {
append("${profileCardAttributes.label1}: ")
}
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) {
append(profileCardAttributes.value1)
}
},
modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp)
)
Text(
text = buildAnnotatedString {
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) {
append("${profileCardAttributes.label2}: ")
}
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) {
append(profileCardAttributes.value2)
}
},
modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp)
)
Text(
text = buildAnnotatedString {
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) {
append("${profileCardAttributes.label3}: ")
}
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) {
append(profileCardAttributes.value3)
}
},
modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 0.dp)
)
}
Column(
modifier = Modifier
.weight(1f)
.padding(start = 20.dp)
) {
profileCardAttributes.imageRes?.let {
Image(
painter = painterResource(id = it),
contentDescription = "Profile Image",
modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier
)
}
profileCardAttributes.badgeText?.let {
Text(
text = it,
style = TextStyle(
fontSize = profileCardStyles.badgeTextFontSize,
fontWeight = profileCardStyles.badgeTextFontWeight
),
color = profileCardStyles.valueColor,
modifier = Modifier
.padding(top = 8.dp, bottom = 5.dp)
.align(Alignment.CenterHorizontally)
)
}
}
}
}
}
}| data class ProfileCardAttributes( | ||
| val name: String? = "", | ||
| val label1: String? = "जनपद", | ||
| val value1: String? = "", | ||
| val label2: String? = "UDISE", | ||
| val value2: String? = "", | ||
| val label3: String? = "ब्लॉक", | ||
| val value3: String? = "", | ||
| val imageRes: Int?, | ||
| val badgeText: String? = null, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve null safety for image resource and badge text.
Consider providing default values for imageRes and badgeText to avoid potential null pointer exceptions.
data class ProfileCardAttributes(
val name: String? = "",
val label1: String? = "जनपद",
val value1: String? = "",
val label2: String? = "UDISE",
val value2: String? = "",
val label3: String? = "ब्लॉक",
val value3: String? = "",
val imageRes: Int? = 0,
val badgeText: String? = ""
)| .onKeyEvent { event -> | ||
| if (event.key == Key.Backspace && event.type == KeyEventType.KeyUp) { | ||
| if (otpInput.length > i) { | ||
| val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply { | ||
| removeAt(i) | ||
| }.joinToString("") | ||
|
|
||
| onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp) | ||
| if (i > 0) { | ||
| focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus() | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (i > 0) { | ||
| focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus() | ||
| } | ||
| true | ||
| } else { | ||
| false | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for potential input errors.
Ensure that the function handles potential input errors gracefully.
- .onKeyEvent { event ->
- if (event.key == Key.Backspace && event.type == KeyEventType.KeyUp) {
- if (otpInput.length > i) {
- val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply {
- removeAt(i)
- }.joinToString("")
-
- onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp)
- if (i > 0) {
- focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus()
- }
- } else if (i > 0) {
- focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus()
- }
- true
- } else {
- false
- }
- },
+ .onKeyEvent { event ->
+ when {
+ event.key == Key.Backspace && event.type == KeyEventType.KeyUp -> {
+ if (otpInput.length > i) {
+ val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply { removeAt(i) }.joinToString("")
+ onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp)
+ if (i > 0) focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus()
+ } else if (i > 0) {
+ focusRequesters[i - 1].requestFocus()
+ }
+ true
+ }
+ else -> false
+ }
+ },Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| value = if (otpInput.length > i) { | ||
| if (maskedChars[i]) "*" else otpInput[i].toString() | ||
| } else "", | ||
| onValueChange = { newOtp -> | ||
| if (newOtp.length <= 1) { | ||
| val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply { | ||
| if (newOtp.isNotEmpty()) { | ||
| if (size > i) { | ||
| this[i] = newOtp[0] | ||
| } else { | ||
| add(newOtp[0]) | ||
| } | ||
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { | ||
| this[i] = true | ||
| } | ||
| if (i < numberOfDigits - 1) { | ||
| focusRequesters[i + 1].requestFocus() | ||
| } else { | ||
| onImeAction?.invoke() | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (size > i) { | ||
| removeAt(i) | ||
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { | ||
| this[i] = false | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }.joinToString("") | ||
|
|
||
| onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize the logic for handling OTP input.
The current logic for handling OTP input can be optimized by using a more concise approach.
- value = if (otpInput.length > i) {
- if (maskedChars[i]) "*" else otpInput[i].toString()
- } else "",
- onValueChange = { newOtp ->
- if (newOtp.length <= 1) {
- val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply {
- if (newOtp.isNotEmpty()) {
- if (size > i) {
- this[i] = newOtp[0]
- } else {
- add(newOtp[0])
- }
- maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply {
- this[i] = true
- }
- if (i < numberOfDigits - 1) {
- focusRequesters[i + 1].requestFocus()
- } else {
- onImeAction?.invoke()
- }
- } else if (size > i) {
- removeAt(i)
- maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply {
- this[i] = false
- }
- }
- }.joinToString("")
-
- onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp)
- }
- },
+ value = otpInput.getOrNull(i)?.takeIf { maskedChars[i] }?.let { "*" } ?: otpInput.getOrNull(i)?.toString() ?: "",
+ onValueChange = { newOtp ->
+ if (newOtp.length <= 1) {
+ val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply {
+ if (newOtp.isNotEmpty()) {
+ if (size > i) this[i] = newOtp[0] else add(newOtp[0])
+ maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { this[i] = true }
+ if (i < numberOfDigits - 1) focusRequesters[i + 1].requestFocus() else onImeAction?.invoke()
+ } else if (size > i) {
+ removeAt(i)
+ maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { this[i] = false }
+ }
+ }.joinToString("")
+ onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp)
+ }
+ },Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| value = if (otpInput.length > i) { | |
| if (maskedChars[i]) "*" else otpInput[i].toString() | |
| } else "", | |
| onValueChange = { newOtp -> | |
| if (newOtp.length <= 1) { | |
| val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply { | |
| if (newOtp.isNotEmpty()) { | |
| if (size > i) { | |
| this[i] = newOtp[0] | |
| } else { | |
| add(newOtp[0]) | |
| } | |
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { | |
| this[i] = true | |
| } | |
| if (i < numberOfDigits - 1) { | |
| focusRequesters[i + 1].requestFocus() | |
| } else { | |
| onImeAction?.invoke() | |
| } | |
| } else if (size > i) { | |
| removeAt(i) | |
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { | |
| this[i] = false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }.joinToString("") | |
| onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp) | |
| } | |
| value = otpInput.getOrNull(i)?.takeIf { maskedChars[i] }?.let { "*" } ?: otpInput.getOrNull(i)?.toString() ?: "", | |
| onValueChange = { newOtp -> | |
| if (newOtp.length <= 1) { | |
| val updatedOtp = otpInput.toMutableList().apply { | |
| if (newOtp.isNotEmpty()) { | |
| if (size > i) this[i] = newOtp[0] else add(newOtp[0]) | |
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { this[i] = true } | |
| if (i < numberOfDigits - 1) focusRequesters[i + 1].requestFocus() else onImeAction?.invoke() | |
| } else if (size > i) { | |
| removeAt(i) | |
| maskedChars = maskedChars.toMutableList().apply { this[i] = false } | |
| } | |
| }.joinToString("") | |
| onOtpInputChange(updatedOtp) | |
| } | |
| }, |
| if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { | ||
| cardAttributes.expandedContent() | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && !cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { | ||
| cardAttributes.expandedContent() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize the logic for handling expandable content.
The current logic for handling expandable content can be optimized by using a more concise approach.
- if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) {
- cardAttributes.expandedContent()
- }
- }
- if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && !cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) {
- cardAttributes.expandedContent()
- }
+ if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded) {
+ cardAttributes.expandedContent()
+ }
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { | |
| cardAttributes.expandedContent() | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && !cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { | |
| cardAttributes.expandedContent() | |
| } | |
| if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded) { | |
| cardAttributes.expandedContent() | |
| } | |
| } |
| cardAttributes: CardAttributes = CardAttributes(), | ||
| cardStyles: CardStyles = CardStyles(), | ||
| ) { | ||
| var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(false) } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential null values in cardAttributes.
Ensure that cardAttributes properties are not null before using them.
- var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(false) }
+ var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(cardAttributes.isExpandable && cardAttributes.expandedContent != {}) }Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| data class CardAttributes( | ||
| val title: String? = null, | ||
| val number: String? = null, | ||
| val subtitle: String? = null, | ||
| val buttonText: String? = null, | ||
| val image: Int? = null, | ||
| val expandImage: Int = R.drawable.expand, | ||
| val collapseImage: Int = R.drawable.compress, | ||
| val attachedExpandedContent: Boolean = false, | ||
| val isExpandable: Boolean = false, | ||
| val expandedContent: @Composable () -> Unit = {}, | ||
| val onCardClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | ||
| val onButtonClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use null as the default value for expandedContent.
Using null as the default value for expandedContent indicates that it is optional.
- val expandedContent: @Composable () -> Unit = {},
+ val expandedContent: (@Composable () -> Unit)? = null,Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| data class CardAttributes( | |
| val title: String? = null, | |
| val number: String? = null, | |
| val subtitle: String? = null, | |
| val buttonText: String? = null, | |
| val image: Int? = null, | |
| val expandImage: Int = R.drawable.expand, | |
| val collapseImage: Int = R.drawable.compress, | |
| val attachedExpandedContent: Boolean = false, | |
| val isExpandable: Boolean = false, | |
| val expandedContent: @Composable () -> Unit = {}, | |
| val onCardClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | |
| val onButtonClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | |
| data class CardAttributes( | |
| val title: String? = null, | |
| val number: String? = null, | |
| val subtitle: String? = null, | |
| val buttonText: String? = null, | |
| val image: Int? = null, | |
| val expandImage: Int = R.drawable.expand, | |
| val collapseImage: Int = R.drawable.compress, | |
| val attachedExpandedContent: Boolean = false, | |
| val isExpandable: Boolean = false, | |
| val expandedContent: (@Composable () -> Unit)? = null, | |
| val onCardClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | |
| val onButtonClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ReadingPassageMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- settings.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- settings.gradle.kts
Additional comments not posted (17)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (2)
15-17: Verify the definitions ofCardAttributesandCardStyles.Ensure that
CardAttributesandCardStylesare well-defined and imported correctly.Run the following script to verify the definitions:
Verification successful
Definitions of
CardAttributesandCardStylesare verified.The data classes
CardAttributesandCardStylesare well-defined in theCardMolecule.ktfile. Ensure they are correctly imported and used in theCardListMolecule.ktfile.
- Located in
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles`. # Test: Search for the definitions. Expect: Definitions of `CardAttributes` and `CardStyles`. rg --type kotlin 'data class CardAttributes|data class CardStyles'Length of output: 282
25-30: Verify the implementation ofCardMolecule.Ensure that
CardMoleculeis correctly implemented and accessible.Run the following script to verify the implementation:
stencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts (6)
15-15: Verify the ProGuard files.Ensure that the
consumer-rules.profile is correctly specified and exists.Run the following script to verify the ProGuard files:
Verification successful
ProGuard File Verified Successfully
The
consumer-rules.profile is correctly specified and exists in thestencilmobilesdirectory. No issues were found regarding its configuration in thebuild.gradle.ktsfile.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the ProGuard files. # Test: Search for the `consumer-rules.pro` file. Expect: The file exists. fd 'consumer-rules.pro'Length of output: 57
69-86: Verify thegroupId,artifactId, andversion.Ensure that the
groupId,artifactId, andversionare correctly specified.Run the following script to verify the
groupId,artifactId, andversion:Verification successful
The
groupId,artifactId, andversionare correctly specified.The values in the
publishingsection ofstencilmobiles/build.gradle.ktsare accurate and match the expected configuration.
groupId:com.github.SamagraartifactId:StencilMobileversion:1.0.0Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `groupId`, `artifactId`, and `version`. # Test: Search for the `groupId`, `artifactId`, and `version`. Expect: The values are correctly specified. rg --type kotlin 'groupId = "com.github.Samagra"|artifactId = "StencilMobile"|version = "1.0.0"'Length of output: 308
81-84: Verify the Maven repository URL.Ensure that the Maven repository
urlis correctly specified.Run the following script to verify the Maven repository URL:
Verification successful
Maven repository URL is correctly specified.
The Maven repository URL
https://jitpack.iois correctly included in therepositoriesblock ofstencilmobiles/build.gradle.kts. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the Maven repository URL. # Test: Search for the Maven repository URL. Expect: The URL is correctly specified. rg --type kotlin 'url = uri("https://jitpack.io")'Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of the `repositories` block and the Maven repository URL in `build.gradle.kts`. # Search for the `repositories` block in Kotlin build scripts. rg --type kotlin 'repositories' -A 5Length of output: 989
1-5: Verify the plugin aliases inlibs.versions.toml.Ensure that the
libs.pluginsaliases are defined in thelibs.versions.tomlfile.Run the following script to verify the plugin aliases:
Verification successful
Plugin aliases are correctly defined in
gradle/libs.versions.toml.The aliases
jetbrains-kotlin-androidandandroid-libraryare present and correctly defined in thegradle/libs.versions.tomlfile.
jetbrains-kotlin-androidis mapped toorg.jetbrains.kotlin.android.android-libraryis mapped tocom.android.library.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the plugin aliases in `libs.versions.toml`. # Test: Search for the plugin aliases. Expect: Definitions of `android.library` and `jetbrains.kotlin.android`. rg --type toml 'android.library|jetbrains.kotlin.android' libs.versions.tomlLength of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all `.toml` files and search for plugin aliases. # List all `.toml` files in the repository. fd --extension toml # Search for plugin aliases in all `.toml` files. rg --type toml 'android.library|jetbrains.kotlin.android'Length of output: 320
42-67: Verify the dependency aliases inlibs.versions.toml.Ensure that the
libsaliases are defined in thelibs.versions.tomlfile.Run the following script to verify the dependency aliases:
Verification successful
Dependency aliases are correctly defined in
gradle/libs.versions.toml.The dependency aliases used in
stencilmobiles/build.gradle.ktsare correctly defined ingradle/libs.versions.toml, ensuring proper dependency management.
androidx.core.ktxandroidx.appcompatmaterialandroidx.foundation.layout.androidjunitandroidx.lifecycle.runtime.ktxandroidx.activity.composeandroidx.ui.tooling.previewandroidx.ui.toolingandroidx.ui.test.manifestandroidx.material3androidx.compose.bomandroidx.ui.test.junit4androidx.espresso.coreScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the dependency aliases in `libs.versions.toml`. # Test: Search for the dependency aliases. Expect: Definitions of the aliases. rg --type toml 'androidx.core.ktx|androidx.appcompat|material|androidx.foundation.layout.android|junit|androidx.lifecycle.runtime.ktx|androidx.activity.compose|androidx.ui.tooling.preview|androidx.ui.tooling|androidx.ui.test.manifest|androidx.material3|androidx.compose.bom|androidx.ui.test.junit4|androidx.espresso.core' libs.versions.tomlLength of output: 401
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any .toml files in the repository to locate the dependency management file. fd --extension tomlLength of output: 47
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the dependency aliases in the located `libs.versions.toml`. rg --type toml 'androidx.core.ktx|androidx.appcompat|material|androidx.foundation.layout.android|junit|androidx.lifecycle.runtime.ktx|androidx.activity.compose|androidx.ui.tooling.preview|androidx.ui.tooling|androidx.ui.test.manifest|androidx.material3|androidx.compose.bom|androidx.ui.test.junit4|androidx.espresso.core' gradle/libs.versions.tomlLength of output: 1919
38-38: Verify the Kotlin compiler extension version.Ensure that the Kotlin compiler extension version
1.5.1is correct and compatible with the project.Run the following script to verify the Kotlin compiler extension version:
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (3)
36-40: Enhance accessibility by adding content descriptions.Ensure that all UI components, especially images and icons, have appropriate content descriptions for accessibility.
139-145: Improve null safety for image resource and badge text.Consider providing default values for
imageUrlandbadgeTextto avoid potential null pointer exceptions.
38-40: Verify the definitions ofProfileCardAttributesandProfileCardStyles.Ensure that
ProfileCardAttributesandProfileCardStylesare well-defined and imported correctly.Run the following script to verify the definitions:
Verification successful
Definitions Verified:
ProfileCardAttributesandProfileCardStylesare well-defined.Both
ProfileCardAttributesandProfileCardStylesare defined as data classes within theProfileCardMolecule.ktfile, ensuring they are correctly implemented and accessible. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions of `ProfileCardAttributes` and `ProfileCardStyles`. # Test: Search for the definitions. Expect: Definitions of `ProfileCardAttributes` and `ProfileCardStyles`. rg --type kotlin 'data class ProfileCardAttributes|data class ProfileCardStyles'Length of output: 324
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/InstructionMolecule.kt (6)
42-48: Improve the usage ofModifier.Using
Modifier?is unconventional. Consider using a defaultModifierinstead for better readability and maintainability.Apply this diff to improve the
Modifierusage:- topInstructionStyle: TopInstructionStyle = TopInstructionStyle(), - bottomInstructionStyle: BottomInstructionStyle = BottomInstructionStyle(), + topInstructionStyle: TopInstructionStyle = TopInstructionStyle(topImageModifier = Modifier), + bottomInstructionStyle: BottomInstructionStyle = BottomInstructionStyle(bottomImageModifier = Modifier),
73-73: Fix the syntax error inLinearProgressIndicator.The progress parameter should be passed as a value instead of a lambda.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax error:
- LinearProgressIndicator( - progress = { it }, + LinearProgressIndicator( + progress = it,
167-199: LGTM!The
ResultBoxfunction is well-implemented and straightforward.
202-231: LGTM!The
ResultRowfunction is well-implemented and straightforward.
233-261: LGTM!The
CustomButtonfunction is well-implemented and straightforward.
263-304: LGTM!The data classes are well-defined and straightforward.
|
|
||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(16.dp), | ||
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| for (cardItem in cardItems) { | ||
| CardMolecule( | ||
| cardAttributes = cardItem, | ||
| cardStyles = cardStyles | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using LazyColumn for performance optimization.
For potentially large lists, using LazyColumn instead of Column can improve performance by only composing visible items.
Apply this diff to use LazyColumn:
-Column(
- modifier = Modifier
- .fillMaxWidth()
- .padding(16.dp),
- verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp)
-) {
- for (cardItem in cardItems) {
- CardMolecule(
- cardAttributes = cardItem,
- cardStyles = cardStyles
- )
- }
-}
+LazyColumn(
+ modifier = Modifier
+ .fillMaxWidth()
+ .padding(16.dp),
+ contentPadding = PaddingValues(vertical = 8.dp)
+) {
+ items(cardItems) { cardItem ->
+ CardMolecule(
+ cardAttributes = cardItem,
+ cardStyles = cardStyles
+ )
+ }
+}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| for (cardItem in cardItems) { | |
| CardMolecule( | |
| cardAttributes = cardItem, | |
| cardStyles = cardStyles | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| LazyColumn( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| contentPadding = PaddingValues(vertical = 8.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| items(cardItems) { cardItem -> | |
| CardMolecule( | |
| cardAttributes = cardItem, | |
| cardStyles = cardStyles | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } |
| .height(180.dp) | ||
| .padding(bottom = 16.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| topInstructionModel.progress?.let { | ||
| LinearProgressIndicator( | ||
| progress = { it }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.height(6.dp), | ||
| color = Color.Blue, | ||
| trackColor = Color.Gray, | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(16.dp)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| topInstructionModel.title?.let { | ||
| androidx.compose.material3.Text( | ||
| text = it, | ||
| fontSize = topInstructionStyle.titleFontSize, | ||
| fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold, | ||
| color = if (topInstructionStyle.backgroundColor != Color.White) Color.White else Color( | ||
| 0xFF30347F | ||
| ), | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(vertical = 3.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| topInstructionModel.resultBoxDataList?.let { | ||
| Box(modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| ) { | ||
| ResultBox( | ||
| resultBoxDataList = topInstructionModel.resultBoxDataList | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| topInstructionModel.subtitle?.let { | ||
| androidx.compose.material3.Text( | ||
| text = it, | ||
| fontSize = topInstructionStyle.subtitleFontSize, | ||
| color = if (topInstructionStyle.backgroundColor != Color.White) Color.White else Color( | ||
| 0xFF5E5D5C | ||
| ), | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .padding(vertical = 3.dp) | ||
| .padding(start = 16.dp, end = 16.dp) | ||
| .align(Alignment.CenterHorizontally), | ||
| textAlign = TextAlign.Center | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| bottomInstructionModel.bottomImageRes?.let { | ||
| if (bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageModifier != null) { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageModifier.align( | ||
| bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageAlignment | ||
| ) | ||
| ) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .width(150.dp) | ||
| .height(150.dp) | ||
| .align(bottomInstructionStyle.bottomImageAlignment) | ||
| .padding(16.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| bottomInstructionModel.buttonConfig?.let { | ||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(vertical = 5.dp) | ||
| .padding(bottom = 10.dp) | ||
| .padding(16.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| CustomButton( | ||
| buttonConfig = it.copy(buttonFontSize = it.buttonFontSize), | ||
| buttonFontSize = it.buttonFontSize | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| bottomInstructionModel.additionalButtons.forEach { buttonConfig -> | ||
| CustomButton( | ||
| buttonConfig = buttonConfig.copy(buttonFontSize = buttonConfig.buttonFontSize), | ||
| buttonFontSize = buttonConfig.buttonFontSize | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider breaking down the InstructionMolecule function.
The InstructionMolecule function is large and complex. Consider breaking it down into smaller, reusable composable functions for better readability and maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt
Additional comments not posted (4)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (4)
28-31: Handle potential null values incardAttributes.Ensure that
cardAttributesproperties are not null before using them.- var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(false) } + var isExpanded by remember { mutableStateOf(cardAttributes.isExpandable && cardAttributes.expandedContent != {}) }
136-142: Optimize the logic for handling expandable content.The current logic for handling expandable content can be optimized by using a more concise approach.
- if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { - cardAttributes.expandedContent() - } - } - if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded && !cardAttributes.attachedExpandedContent) { - cardAttributes.expandedContent() - } + if (cardAttributes.isExpandable && isExpanded) { + cardAttributes.expandedContent() + } + }
157-157: Usenullas the default value forexpandedContent.Using
nullas the default value forexpandedContentindicates that it is optional.- val expandedContent: @Composable () -> Unit = {}, + val expandedContent: (@Composable () -> Unit)? = null,
162-186: LGTM!The data class
CardStylesis well-defined and does not require any changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1)
39-178: Consider splitting the function into smaller composable functions to improve readability and maintainability.The
ProfileCardMoleculefunction is quite large and can be split into smaller composable functions to improve readability and maintainability. For example, you can extract the code for rendering the name, labels, values, image, and badge text into separate composable functions.Additionally, consider the following improvements:
- Use
Spacerinstead ofModifier.paddingto add spacing between elements.- Use
Modifier.fillMaxWidth()instead ofModifier.width()to make the badge text fill the available width.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1)
20-32: Consider usingLazyColumnfor performance optimization.The existing comment from the previous review is still valid and applicable to the current code.
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (2)
180-191: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
193-209: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
| @Composable | ||
| fun CardListMolecule( | ||
| cardItems: List<CardAttributes>, | ||
| cardStyles: List<CardStyles> | ||
| ) { | ||
| val itemCount = minOf(cardItems.size, cardStyles.size) | ||
|
|
||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(16.dp), | ||
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| for (index in 0 until itemCount) { | ||
| CardMolecule( | ||
| cardAttributes = cardItems[index], | ||
| cardStyles = cardStyles[index] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve performance and simplify the code using LazyColumn and zip.
Please consider applying this diff to improve the function:
@Composable
fun CardListMolecule(
cardItems: List<CardAttributes>,
cardStyles: List<CardStyles>
) {
- val itemCount = minOf(cardItems.size, cardStyles.size)
-
- Column(
+ LazyColumn(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(16.dp),
- verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp)
+ contentPadding = PaddingValues(vertical = 8.dp)
) {
- for (index in 0 until itemCount) {
+ items(cardItems.zip(cardStyles)) { (cardItem, cardStyle) ->
CardMolecule(
- cardAttributes = cardItems[index],
- cardStyles = cardStyles[index]
+ cardAttributes = cardItem,
+ cardStyles = cardStyle
)
}
}
}The changes:
- Replace
ColumnwithLazyColumnfor better performance when rendering large lists. - Use
contentPaddinginstead ofverticalArrangementto add spacing between items. - Use
zipto combinecardItemsandcardStylesand avoid the need foritemCount. - Use destructuring to access
cardItemandcardStylein theitemslambda.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Composable | |
| fun CardListMolecule( | |
| cardItems: List<CardAttributes>, | |
| cardStyles: List<CardStyles> | |
| ) { | |
| val itemCount = minOf(cardItems.size, cardStyles.size) | |
| Column( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| for (index in 0 until itemCount) { | |
| CardMolecule( | |
| cardAttributes = cardItems[index], | |
| cardStyles = cardStyles[index] | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| @Composable | |
| fun CardListMolecule( | |
| cardItems: List<CardAttributes>, | |
| cardStyles: List<CardStyles> | |
| ) { | |
| LazyColumn( | |
| modifier = Modifier | |
| .fillMaxWidth() | |
| .padding(16.dp), | |
| contentPadding = PaddingValues(vertical = 8.dp) | |
| ) { | |
| items(cardItems.zip(cardStyles)) { (cardItem, cardStyle) -> | |
| CardMolecule( | |
| cardAttributes = cardItem, | |
| cardStyles = cardStyle | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (3)
26-146: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
The previous review comments are still valid and have been skipped.
148-162: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
164-189: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/LoginMolecule.kt (6)
199-204: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
206-214: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
216-226: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
228-236: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
238-243: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
245-249: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
|
|
||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(20.dp)) | ||
|
|
||
| Text( | ||
| text = otpModel.resendOtpText, | ||
| textDecoration = TextDecoration.Underline, | ||
| style = otpStyle.resendTextStyle, | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .clickable { otpModel.onResendOtpClick() } | ||
| .padding(horizontal = 16.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } else { | ||
| GenericInputFieldMolecule( | ||
| input = genericText, | ||
| onInputChange = { | ||
| genericText = it | ||
| loginModel.onGenericInputChange(it) | ||
| }, | ||
| hint = loginModel.inputHint ?: "", | ||
| inputType = loginModel.inputType, | ||
| textFieldBackgroundColor = loginStyle.textFieldBackgroundColor, | ||
| onImeAction = loginModel.onImeAction, | ||
| textStyle = loginStyle.inputTextStyle | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(8.dp)) | ||
|
|
||
| loginModel.passwordInput?.let { | ||
| OutlinedTextField( | ||
| value = passwordText, | ||
| onValueChange = { | ||
| passwordText = it | ||
| loginModel.onPasswordInputChange(it) | ||
| }, | ||
| placeholder = { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = "Password", | ||
| style = loginStyle.inputTextStyle, | ||
| color = Color.Gray, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth() | ||
| ) | ||
| }, | ||
| singleLine = true, | ||
| visualTransformation = if (passwordVisible) VisualTransformation.None else PasswordVisualTransformation(), | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .border( | ||
| width = 1.dp, | ||
| color = borderColor, | ||
| shape = RoundedCornerShape(4.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| .background(loginStyle.textFieldBackgroundColor) | ||
| .onFocusChanged { focusState -> | ||
| borderColor = if (focusState.isFocused) Color.Black else Color.LightGray | ||
| }, | ||
| textStyle = loginStyle.inputTextStyle, | ||
| trailingIcon = { | ||
| IconButton(onClick = { passwordVisible = !passwordVisible }) { | ||
| Icon( | ||
| imageVector = if (passwordVisible) Icons.Default.Visibility else Icons.Default.VisibilityOff, | ||
| contentDescription = if (passwordVisible) "Hide password" else "Show password" | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(20.dp)) | ||
|
|
||
| Text( | ||
| text = loginModel.forgetPasswordText, | ||
| style = loginStyle.forgetTextStyle, | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .clickable { loginModel.onForgotPasswordClick() } | ||
| .padding(horizontal = 16.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.height(5.dp)) | ||
|
|
||
| Button( | ||
| onClick = loginCommonModel.onButtonClick, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.fillMaxWidth(), | ||
| shape = RoundedCornerShape(6.dp), | ||
| colors = ButtonDefaults.buttonColors(loginCommonStyle.buttonBackgroundColor) | ||
| ) { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = loginCommonModel.buttonText, | ||
| style = loginCommonStyle.buttonTextStyle | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(8.dp)) | ||
| Icon( | ||
| imageVector = Icons.AutoMirrored.Filled.ArrowForward, | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| tint = Color.White, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(start = 8.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Break down the LoginMolecule function into smaller, more focused functions.
The LoginMolecule function is quite large and complex, making it difficult to understand and maintain. Consider breaking it down into smaller, more focused functions that each have a single responsibility. For example, you could extract the rendering logic for the OTP input and the generic input field into separate functions. You could also extract the rendering logic for the button into a separate function. This will make the code easier to read, understand, and maintain.
Additionally, consider extracting the UI properties, such as padding and spacing, into a separate theme or style object. This will make the code more flexible and easier to customize.
Also, consider using more descriptive names for the parameters and variables, and adding more comments to explain the purpose and behavior of each section of the code. This will make the code easier to understand and maintain.
Finally, consider using more type-safe and null-safe code, such as using let instead of ?:, and using more idiomatic Kotlin code, such as using by instead of = for delegated properties.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (2)
71-83: Ensure Consistent Styling for Title and Number TextThe
titleandnumbertexts are both usingcardStyles.titleTextStyle. If they are meant to have different styles, consider defining separate text styles inCardStyles. If the same style is intended, no action is needed.
157-158: RenameexpandImageandcollapseImagefor ClarityThe property names
expandImageandcollapseImagemay be misleading given their usage. Consider renaming them toexpandedIconandcollapsedIconto better reflect that they represent the icon shown when the card is in the expanded or collapsed state, respectively.stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/SimpleListItemMolecule.kt (2)
48-48: Remove commented-out codeThe
elevationproperty in theCardcomposable is commented out (line 48). If elevation is not needed, consider removing this commented-out code to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
207-221: Add documentation comments to public classes and functionsConsider adding KDoc comments to the
SimpleListItemAttributes(lines 207-221) andSimpleListItemStyles(lines 223-270) data classes, as well as theSimpleListItemMoleculecomposable function (line 37). This will help other developers understand the purpose and usage of these components, improving code readability and maintainability.Also applies to: 223-270
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/SimpleListItemMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (3)
96-103: Verify Button Behavior for Expandable and Non-Expandable CardsIn the
Button'sonClickhandler, theonButtonClickaction is only invoked whencardAttributes.isExpandableisfalse(lines 100-102). This means that for expandable cards,onButtonClickwill not be called.Please verify if this is the intended behavior. If expandable cards should also perform an action on button click, you might need to adjust the logic.
86-91: Handle Layout WhensubtitleIs AbsentWhen
subtitleisnull, ensure that the vertical spacing and layout remain visually consistent to avoid unexpected gaps or misalignment in the UI.
161-161: Usingnullas the Default Value forexpandedContentAs previously suggested, consider changing the default value of
expandedContenttonullto signify its optional nature.
| cardAttributes.imageRes?.let { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = cardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(10.dp)) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| cardAttributes.imageUrl?.let{ | ||
| AsyncImage( | ||
| model = it, | ||
| contentDescription = "Profile Image", | ||
| modifier = cardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(10.dp)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor Image Loading to Reduce Code Duplication
The blocks handling imageRes and imageUrl are similar and can be consolidated to enhance maintainability and readability.
Consider refactoring as follows:
cardAttributes.imageRes?.let { resId ->
Image(
painter = painterResource(id = resId),
contentDescription = cardAttributes.imageContentDescription,
modifier = cardStyles.imageModifier
)
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(10.dp))
} ?: cardAttributes.imageUrl?.let { url ->
AsyncImage(
model = url,
contentDescription = cardAttributes.imageContentDescription,
modifier = cardStyles.imageModifier
)
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(10.dp))
}Additionally, you may add an imageContentDescription property to CardAttributes to improve accessibility:
val imageContentDescription: String? = null,| data class CardAttributes( | ||
| val title: String? = null, | ||
| val number: String? = null, | ||
| val subtitle: String? = null, | ||
| val buttonText: String? = null, | ||
| val imageRes: Int? = null, | ||
| val imageUrl: String? = null, | ||
| val expandImage: Int = R.drawable.expand, | ||
| val collapseImage: Int = R.drawable.compress, | ||
| val attachedExpandedContent: Boolean = false, | ||
| val isExpandable: Boolean = false, | ||
| val expandedContent: @Composable () -> Unit = {}, | ||
| val onCardClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | ||
| val onButtonClick: (() -> Unit)? = null, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use Nullable Types Judiciously in CardAttributes
The properties title, number, subtitle, and buttonText are defined as String? and default to null. If these properties are frequently non-null, consider using non-nullable String types with default empty strings to simplify null checks in the composable function.
Example:
val title: String = "",
val number: String = "",This change can reduce the need for safe calls and let blocks when displaying these properties.
| if (isExpanded) { | ||
| Icon( | ||
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.expandImage), | ||
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } else { | ||
| Icon( | ||
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.collapseImage), | ||
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Swap the Expand and Collapse Icons for Correct UX
The logic for displaying the expand and collapse icons seems inverted. Typically, when the content is expanded, the button should show a collapse icon, indicating that clicking it will collapse the content. Conversely, when the content is collapsed, it should show an expand icon.
Currently:
- When
isExpandedistrue, it displayscardAttributes.expandImage(line 122). - When
isExpandedisfalse, it displayscardAttributes.collapseImage(line 129).
To correct this, swap the icons so they match the expected behavior.
Apply this diff to fix the icon display:
if (isExpanded) {
Icon(
- painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.expandImage),
+ painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.collapseImage),
tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage,
contentDescription = null,
modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier
)
} else {
Icon(
- painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.collapseImage),
+ painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.expandImage),
tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage,
contentDescription = null,
modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier
)
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (isExpanded) { | |
| Icon( | |
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.expandImage), | |
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | |
| contentDescription = null, | |
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| Icon( | |
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.collapseImage), | |
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | |
| contentDescription = null, | |
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| if (isExpanded) { | |
| Icon( | |
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.collapseImage), | |
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | |
| contentDescription = null, | |
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } else { | |
| Icon( | |
| painter = painterResource(cardAttributes.expandImage), | |
| tint = cardStyles.colorExpandCollapseImage, | |
| contentDescription = null, | |
| modifier = cardStyles.buttonImageModifier | |
| ) | |
| } |
| simpleListItemAttributes.imageRes?.let { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = simpleListItemStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(10.dp)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Provide meaningful content descriptions for images
In the Image and AsyncImage composables (lines 60-66 and 69-75), the contentDescription parameter is set to null or hardcoded. To improve accessibility, consider making contentDescription a parameter in SimpleListItemAttributes, allowing callers to provide meaningful descriptions for images.
Also applies to: 69-75
| if (simpleListItemAttributes.button1Text != null || simpleListItemAttributes.button1ImageRes != null) { | ||
| Button( | ||
| onClick = { | ||
| simpleListItemAttributes.onButton1Click?.invoke() | ||
| }, | ||
| colors = ButtonDefaults.buttonColors(simpleListItemStyles.button1BackgroundColor), | ||
| shape = RoundedCornerShape(simpleListItemStyles.button1Corner), | ||
| modifier = simpleListItemStyles.button1Modifier, | ||
| border = simpleListItemStyles.button1Border, | ||
| contentPadding = simpleListItemStyles.button1ContentPadding | ||
| ) { | ||
| simpleListItemAttributes.button1ImageRes?.let { | ||
| if (simpleListItemStyles.isImgBeforeButton1Text) { | ||
| Icon( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = simpleListItemAttributes.button1ImageRes), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = simpleListItemStyles.button1ImageModifier, | ||
| tint = simpleListItemStyles.button1ImageColor | ||
| ) | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(simpleListItemStyles.gapBetweenImageAndText)) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| simpleListItemAttributes.button1Text?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = it, | ||
| style = simpleListItemStyles.button1TextStyle | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| simpleListItemAttributes.button1ImageRes?.let { | ||
| if (!simpleListItemStyles.isImgBeforeButton1Text) { | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(simpleListItemStyles.gapBetweenImageAndText)) | ||
| Icon( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = simpleListItemAttributes.button1ImageRes), | ||
| contentDescription = null, | ||
| modifier = simpleListItemStyles.button1ImageModifier, | ||
| tint = simpleListItemStyles.button1ImageColor | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor duplicate button code into a reusable composable
The code for rendering button1 (lines 109-151) and button2 (lines 158-199) is quite similar. To reduce code duplication and improve maintainability, consider extracting this logic into a separate reusable composable function that can handle button rendering based on provided attributes and styles.
Also applies to: 158-199
| simpleListItemStyles.gapBetweenButton?.let { | ||
| Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(simpleListItemStyles.gapBetweenButton)) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid nullable styling properties by providing default values
The gapBetweenButton property is defined as a nullable Dp? (line 264) and used with a null check (lines 154-156). To simplify the code and avoid nullability checks, consider providing a default value (e.g., 0.dp) and making the type non-nullable.
Apply this diff to make the change:
- val gapBetweenButton: Dp? = null,
+ val gapBetweenButton: Dp = 0.dp,Update the usage accordingly:
Spacer(modifier = Modifier.width(simpleListItemStyles.gapBetweenButton))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1)
202-218: Consider using more descriptive names for some style properties.While most of the property names in
ProfileCardStylesare clear, some could be more descriptive to improve readability and maintainability.Consider the following suggestions:
data class ProfileCardStyles( // ... other properties ... val nameTextGradientColors: List<Color> = listOf(Color(0xFF3D3C3C)), val cardBorderWidth: Dp = 4.dp, val imageSize: Dp = 64.dp, val badgeTextWidth: Dp = 100.dp, val imageTopPadding: Dp = 0.dp )These changes make the purpose of each property more immediately clear:
gradientColors→nameTextGradientColorsborderWidth→cardBorderWidthimageModifier→ Split intoimageSizebadgeTextModifier→ Split intobadgeTextWidthgapImageDivider→imageTopPaddingUpdate the usage of these properties accordingly in the
ProfileCardMoleculecomposable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt
| .height(2.dp) | ||
| .background(brush = Brush.linearGradient(colors = profileCardStyles.gradientColors)) | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| Row( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(start = 10.dp, end = 10.dp), | ||
| horizontalArrangement = Arrangement.SpaceBetween | ||
| ) { | ||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .weight(1.5f) | ||
| .padding(top = 18.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| profileCardAttributes.value1?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label1}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value1) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.value2?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label2}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value2) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.value3?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label3}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value3) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 5.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .weight(1f) | ||
| .padding(start = 20.dp, top = profileCardStyles.gapImageDivider), | ||
| horizontalAlignment = Alignment.End | ||
| ) { | ||
| profileCardAttributes.imageUrl?.let { | ||
| AsyncImage( | ||
| model = profileCardAttributes.imageUrl, | ||
| contentDescription = "Profile Image", | ||
| modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.imageRes?.let { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = "Profile Image", | ||
| modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.badgeText?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = it, | ||
| style = TextStyle( | ||
| fontSize = profileCardStyles.badgeTextFontSize, | ||
| fontWeight = profileCardStyles.badgeTextFontWeight, | ||
| textAlign = TextAlign.Center | ||
| ), | ||
| color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, | ||
| modifier = profileCardStyles.badgeTextModifier | ||
| .padding(top = 8.dp, bottom = 5.dp) | ||
| .align(Alignment.End) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider breaking down the ProfileCardMolecule composable into smaller functions.
The ProfileCardMolecule function is quite long and complex. To improve readability and maintainability, consider breaking it down into smaller, reusable composables. For example:
- Create a separate composable for the name section.
- Create a composable for each label-value pair.
- Create a composable for the image and badge section.
This will make the code easier to understand and maintain.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the name section:
@Composable
private fun NameSection(name: String?, styles: ProfileCardStyles) {
name?.let {
if (styles.nameTextColor != null) {
Text(
text = it,
style = MaterialTheme.typography.headlineSmall,
color = styles.nameTextColor,
fontWeight = FontWeight.Bold,
modifier = Modifier
.padding(bottom = 3.dp)
.align(Alignment.CenterHorizontally)
)
} else {
Text(
text = it,
style = styles.nameTextStyle.copy(
brush = Brush.linearGradient(colors = styles.gradientColors)
),
color = Color.Transparent,
modifier = Modifier
.padding(bottom = 3.dp)
.align(Alignment.CenterHorizontally)
)
}
}
}You can create similar composables for other sections and use them in the main ProfileCardMolecule function.
| profileCardAttributes.value1?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label1}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value1) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.value2?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label2}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value2) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.value3?.let { | ||
| Text( | ||
| text = buildAnnotatedString { | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.labelColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.labelFontWeight)) { | ||
| append("${profileCardAttributes.label3}: ") | ||
| } | ||
| withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = profileCardStyles.valueColor, fontSize = profileCardStyles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = profileCardStyles.valueFontWeight)) { | ||
| append(profileCardAttributes.value3) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 5.dp) | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve null handling for label-value pairs.
The current implementation checks for null values only for the value fields. However, it's possible that the label fields could also be null. To make the code more robust, consider checking both label and value for null before rendering.
Here's an example of how you could improve the null handling:
private fun renderLabelValuePair(label: String?, value: String?, styles: ProfileCardStyles) {
if (label != null && value != null) {
Text(
text = buildAnnotatedString {
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = styles.labelColor, fontSize = styles.labelFontSize, fontWeight = styles.labelFontWeight)) {
append("$label: ")
}
withStyle(style = SpanStyle(color = styles.valueColor, fontSize = styles.valueFontSize, fontWeight = styles.valueFontWeight)) {
append(value)
}
},
modifier = Modifier.padding(bottom = 12.dp)
)
}
}
// Usage in the composable
renderLabelValuePair(profileCardAttributes.label1, profileCardAttributes.value1, profileCardStyles)
renderLabelValuePair(profileCardAttributes.label2, profileCardAttributes.value2, profileCardStyles)
renderLabelValuePair(profileCardAttributes.label3, profileCardAttributes.value3, profileCardStyles)This approach ensures that both label and value are non-null before rendering, preventing potential null pointer exceptions.
| profileCardAttributes.imageUrl?.let { | ||
| AsyncImage( | ||
| model = profileCardAttributes.imageUrl, | ||
| contentDescription = "Profile Image", | ||
| modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| profileCardAttributes.imageRes?.let { | ||
| Image( | ||
| painter = painterResource(id = it), | ||
| contentDescription = "Profile Image", | ||
| modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add content descriptions for accessibility.
The image composables (both AsyncImage and Image) are using a hardcoded content description. To improve accessibility, consider passing a meaningful description as part of the ProfileCardAttributes.
Update the ProfileCardAttributes data class to include an imageContentDescription field:
data class ProfileCardAttributes(
// ... other fields ...
val imageContentDescription: String? = null,
)Then, use this field in the image composables:
AsyncImage(
model = profileCardAttributes.imageUrl,
contentDescription = profileCardAttributes.imageContentDescription ?: "Profile Image",
modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier
)
Image(
painter = painterResource(id = it),
contentDescription = profileCardAttributes.imageContentDescription ?: "Profile Image",
modifier = profileCardStyles.imageModifier
)This change allows for more descriptive and context-specific content descriptions, enhancing the accessibility of the component.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardMolecule.kt
- stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/ProfileCardMolecule.kt
🔇 Additional comments (1)
stencilmobiles/src/main/java/com/samagra/stencilmobiles/molecules/CardListMolecule.kt (1)
1-18: LGTM: Imports and function signature are well-structured.The imports cover all necessary Jetpack Compose components, and the function signature is clear and concise. The default value for
cardListPaddingenhances reusability.
| val itemCount = minOf(cardItems.size, cardStyles.size) | ||
|
|
||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(cardListPadding), | ||
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| for (index in 0 until itemCount) { | ||
| CardMolecule( | ||
| cardAttributes = cardItems[index], | ||
| cardStyles = cardStyles[index] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing the implementation for performance and idiomatic Kotlin.
While the current implementation works, there are several areas for improvement:
-
The use of
minOfmight silently ignore extra items if the lists have different sizes. Consider adding a warning log or throwing an exception if the lists are of unequal length. -
For potentially large lists, using
LazyColumninstead ofColumncan improve performance by only composing visible items. -
The iteration can be more idiomatic using Kotlin's collection operations.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
@Composable
fun CardListMolecule(
cardItems: List<CardAttributes>,
cardStyles: List<CardStyles>,
cardListPadding: PaddingValues = PaddingValues(16.dp)
) {
require(cardItems.size == cardStyles.size) { "cardItems and cardStyles must have the same size" }
LazyColumn(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(cardListPadding),
verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp)
) {
items(cardItems.size) { index ->
CardMolecule(
cardAttributes = cardItems[index],
cardStyles = cardStyles[index]
)
}
}
}This refactoring:
- Ensures the input lists have the same size.
- Uses
LazyColumnfor better performance with large lists. - Uses the
itemsDSL for more idiomatic list iteration in Compose.
| package com.samagra.stencilmobiles.molecules | ||
|
|
||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.Arrangement | ||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.Column | ||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.PaddingValues | ||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.fillMaxWidth | ||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.layout.padding | ||
| import androidx.compose.foundation.lazy.LazyColumn | ||
| import androidx.compose.runtime.Composable | ||
| import androidx.compose.ui.Modifier | ||
| import androidx.compose.ui.unit.dp | ||
|
|
||
| @Composable | ||
| fun CardListMolecule( | ||
| cardItems: List<CardAttributes>, | ||
| cardStyles: List<CardStyles>, | ||
| cardListPadding: PaddingValues = PaddingValues(16.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| val itemCount = minOf(cardItems.size, cardStyles.size) | ||
|
|
||
| Column( | ||
| modifier = Modifier | ||
| .fillMaxWidth() | ||
| .padding(cardListPadding), | ||
| verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp) | ||
| ) { | ||
| for (index in 0 until itemCount) { | ||
| CardMolecule( | ||
| cardAttributes = cardItems[index], | ||
| cardStyles = cardStyles[index] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Incorporate previous suggestions for optimal performance and readability.
Building upon the previous suggestions and our latest review, here's an optimized version that incorporates the use of both LazyColumn and zip:
@Composable
fun CardListMolecule(
cardItems: List<CardAttributes>,
cardStyles: List<CardStyles>,
cardListPadding: PaddingValues = PaddingValues(16.dp)
) {
require(cardItems.size == cardStyles.size) { "cardItems and cardStyles must have the same size" }
LazyColumn(
modifier = Modifier
.fillMaxWidth()
.padding(cardListPadding),
verticalArrangement = Arrangement.spacedBy(8.dp)
) {
items(cardItems.zip(cardStyles)) { (item, style) ->
CardMolecule(
cardAttributes = item,
cardStyles = style
)
}
}
}This final version:
- Uses
LazyColumnfor efficient rendering of large lists. - Employs
zipto paircardItemswithcardStyles, eliminating the need for index-based access. - Uses destructuring in the
itemslambda for cleaner, more readable code. - Retains the input validation to ensure lists are of equal size.
These changes address all the points raised in the previous reviews while maintaining the function's original purpose and improving its performance and readability.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
CardMoleculefor creating customizable card components with interactive features, including expandable content.ProfileCardMoleculefor displaying user profiles with customizable attributes and styles.CardListMoleculeto display a list of customizable cards in a vertical arrangement.Testing