-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ruff checks for numpydocs #5630
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5630 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 89.69% 89.69%
=======================================
Files 90 90
Lines 22807 22807
Branches 5441 5441
=======================================
Hits 20456 20456
Misses 1618 1618
Partials 733 733 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tkknight Great thanks.
So this is an interim no-op change. You've added Dxxx
rules to the .ruff.toml
but will only be enabled by removing the pydocstyle
category rule "D"
... plus you're working on other pydocstyle rules to address.
I'm totally okay with this 👍
* upstream/main: ruff checks for numpydocs (SciTools#5630) Add whatsnew entries (SciTools#5626)
🚀 Pull Request
Description
Ruff compliant.
Part of #4721
Consult Iris pull request check list