[BugFix] When the server machine is not recovered, transaction will nerver complete.

[zhangheihei]

Why I'm doing:

1. Transaction TA writes to a two-replicas tablet and enters the committed state. The tablet's replica are replicaA, replicaB.
2. replicaA, replicaB generate tasks: PublishVersionTaskA, PublishVersionTaskB. PublishVersionTaskA/PublishVersionTaskB successfully submitted to the beA/beB via RPC.
3. The machine where beB is located hangs and is not recoverable. Therefore PublishVersionTaskA is finished,PublishVersionTaskB is unfinished.
4. FE clone replicaC from replicaA, BE report replicaC info. But transactions must rely on replicaA and replicaB, so TA will block on committed.

What I'm doing:

Fixes #52769

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0
  • 2.5

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
5 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
2.7% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

❌ fail : 16 / 24 (66.67%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/transaction/DatabaseTransactionMgr.java	2	4	50.00%	[1100, 1101]
🔵	com/starrocks/transaction/TransactionState.java	8	14	57.14%	[470, 471, 472, 474, 480, 481]
🔵	com/starrocks/transaction/OlapTableTxnLogApplier.java	6	6	100.00%	[]

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)