release: add human-reviewed findability conventions for v1.12.0 - #49
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
v1.12.0package, plugin, changelog, version, and release-note metadata.Why
Issue #48 exposed a retrieval-aware planning practice that was broader than one naming example. The runtime had useful but distributed cues for findability, practice reuse, approval, and cross-repository authority. It did not define consumer testing, a human convention proposal, or a scalable but bounded path from local success to portfolio adoption.
The new workflow keeps conventions conversational and reversible by default. It does not add a taxonomy, profile, registry, connector, manager service, feedback-artifact directory, or automation interface.
User and developer impact
Humans now receive the proposed convention for discussion before files change. Agents compare no change and scoped adaptation, test actual human, agent, and tool consumers when authorized, preserve legacy compatibility, and cannot infer portfolio write authority from a local success or positive comment.
GitHub Issues remain the feedback and task surface. Accepted operational evidence that validates or extends runtime behavior maps to an existing or proposed fixture without adding reporter burden.
Traceability
findability-and-conventions.mdowns the runtime behavior.Validation
npm run test:eval: 75 cases across 18 segments.npm run validate: pass.npm run package -- v1.12.0: pass.npm run release:verify-assets -- v1.12.0: pass.npm run release:preflight -- v1.12.0: pass, including unused remote identity,gh skill publish --dry-run, two deterministic builds, and unchanged candidate-tree verification.Candidate tree SHA-256:
6e9bc0990deeb3698e1cf6c096acec91319cc32bfe8636e67d13692247e991bd.This pull request is intentionally draft. Technical releasability does not authorize publishing the final GitHub Release.