Skip to content

Add dependence on libhdf5 and basic implementation class structure. #304

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

samcunliffe
Copy link
Member

A cherry-pick of the first few commits of #250 for factorised review.

First part of (does not solve)

Supercedes

Co-authored-by: Mosè Giordano <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Will Graham <[email protected]>
@samcunliffe samcunliffe added the enhancement New feature or request label May 19, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 72% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (8ae70f0) 24% compared to head (92e0194) 25%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@         Coverage Diff         @@
##           main   #304   +/-   ##
===================================
  Coverage    24%    25%           
===================================
  Files        64     65    +1     
  Lines      3595   3627   +32     
===================================
+ Hits        870    893   +23     
- Misses     2725   2734    +9     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tdms/src/hdf5_io.cpp 72% <72%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@samcunliffe samcunliffe requested a review from willGraham01 May 19, 2023 12:04
@samcunliffe samcunliffe marked this pull request as ready for review May 19, 2023 12:04
@samcunliffe
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is a good first bite of the HDF5 stuff. Let's both review it.

Comment on lines 98 to 101
bool HDF5Base::is_ok() const {
return true;
//
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is aspirational and we may want to remove it.... @willGraham01 what do you think? Should we remove it here? Probably yes.

@samcunliffe samcunliffe added the review required A review approval is required before merging label May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request review required A review approval is required before merging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants