Skip to content

👷 Run checks on Woodpecker - #31

Merged
Vilos92 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
woodpecker-ci
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

👷 Run checks on Woodpecker#31
Vilos92 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
woodpecker-ci

Conversation

@Vilos92

@Vilos92 Vilos92 commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Runs the JS and Rust CI checks on the greg-zone Woodpecker instance instead of GitHub Actions.

After one shared bun install (bun-git image), format, lint, comment-format, typecheck and the fallow audit fan out in parallel. rust-fmt and clippy run in a new local greg-zone/gdex-rust image (rust 1.95.0 with rustfmt, clippy and the Tauri Linux libraries) and start immediately, needing no bun install. Rust steps invoke cargo directly since the bun scripts are thin wrappers.

The desktop-macos Tauri .app bundle build stays in .github/workflows/builds.yaml on GitHub Actions — a Linux Docker backend cannot produce a macOS bundle. Both composite actions under .github/actions/ are kept for that workflow.

Rehearsed locally against a simulated merge of this branch into main: all JS checks green (fallow diffing HEAD^1), and both Rust checks green (clippy 0 warnings) in the new image.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Format, lint, comment-format, typecheck and fallow audit run in the
greg-zone bun-git image after one shared bun install; rust-fmt and clippy
run in a local rust image with the Tauri Linux libraries. The desktop-macos
Tauri bundle build stays in .github/workflows/, as a Linux Docker backend
cannot produce a macOS .app.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 26 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: af85ae51-ace9-4d83-b631-df401c71f5c1

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c1524d and 0956d9c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/continuous-integration.yaml
  • .woodpecker.yml

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@Vilos92
Vilos92 merged commit fb529e9 into main Aug 4, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant