Open
Conversation
atomic add seq
ol-alexandra
suggested changes
Jul 14, 2025
Contributor
ol-alexandra
left a comment
ol-alexandra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change itself looks reasonable, but the commit log should include more details, I think. The description of the pull request includes all these details, but the git commit log does not.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When two threads concurrently invoke the socket function, the absence of lock protection in citp_fdinfo_init may occasionally result in identical sequence numbers (seq) being assigned to different file descriptor information (fdi) entries.