Adjust SIMD legend into quintiles and tweak copy #186
Conversation
michaelkirk
force-pushed
the
mkirk/simd-followup
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8b30d57 to
b54b9f6
Compare
| people, and a SIMD rank of {props.imd_rank}, putting it in the {props.imd_percentile} | ||
| percentile. | ||
| people, and a SIMD rank of {props.imd_rank}, making it less deprived | ||
| than {props.imd_percentile}% of data zones. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I felt that "putting it in the 15th percentile" was ambiguous (is that good or bad?) if you aren't already familiar with SIMD ranking conventions. Plus we're no longer showing percentile in the legend as a reference for these units.
"less deprived than 15%" is kind of a weird way to phrase it, but it at least explains that a higher number is better.
Personally, I think "more deprived than 70%" might be more natural to read, but I didn't want to invert the metric, since some people might already be familiar with the concept of SIMD percentiles.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This reads fine to me. We could ask if "more deprived" would be preferable/easier to read.
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | |||
| <script> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a fork of SequentialLegend from svelte-utils, but the labels fall on the buckets rather than between the buckets (consequently, there's one less label).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! I might upstream this and use in NPW too.
Missing TS types, but I'll add them after merging the PR stacks to avoid any rebase headache.
michaelkirk
force-pushed
the
mkirk/simd-followup
branch
from
b54b9f6 to
5a4ad6b
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | |||
| <script> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! I might upstream this and use in NPW too.
Missing TS types, but I'll add them after merging the PR stacks to avoid any rebase headache.
| people, and a SIMD rank of {props.imd_rank}, putting it in the {props.imd_percentile} | ||
| percentile. | ||
| people, and a SIMD rank of {props.imd_rank}, making it less deprived | ||
| than {props.imd_percentile}% of data zones. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This reads fine to me. We could ask if "more deprived" would be preferable/easier to read.
FIXES #136 (mostly done before, but these are the final touches)
Some small tweaks based on our last meeting.
before:
after:
