Skip to content

chore: Fix esm outputs, bump target, simplify build#196

Open
pxrl wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
pxrl/esm
Open

chore: Fix esm outputs, bump target, simplify build#196
pxrl wants to merge 6 commits intomasterfrom
pxrl/esm

Conversation

@pxrl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pxrl pxrl commented Apr 1, 2026

  • Added .js extensions to relative imports for Node.js ESM compatibility
  • Modernized tsconfig: target ES2022, module/moduleResolution nodenext, verbatimModuleSyntax.
  • Split into tsconfig.json (ESM + declarations) and tsconfig.cjs.json (CJS), eliminating the separate types build (3 tsc passes → 2)
  • Simplified build scripts and removed redundant ESM sub-package.json

pxrl added 2 commits April 1, 2026 22:26
 - Added .js extensions to relative imports for Node.js ESM compatibility
 - Modernized tsconfig: target ES2022, module/moduleResolution nodenext,
   verbatimModuleSyntax.
 - Split into tsconfig.json (ESM + declarations) and tsconfig.cjs.json
   (CJS), eliminating the separate types build (3 tsc passes → 2)
 - Simplified build scripts and removed redundant ESM sub-package.json
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d64fd9ae6d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@pxrl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pxrl commented Apr 1, 2026

@codex review

@pxrl pxrl requested review from 0xjorgen and gsteenkamp89 April 1, 2026 22:35
@pxrl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pxrl commented Apr 1, 2026

@0xjorgen @gsteenkamp89 I see you have issues w/ this package downstream, and per current implementation, it's also a hindrance for us to migrate to esm. Would be nice to roll some fixes here and then down in the SDK too.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 999d170289

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@pxrl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pxrl commented Apr 2, 2026

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@pxrl pxrl requested a review from dohaki April 3, 2026 08:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant