Skip to content

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been...

Moderate severity Unreviewed Published Jul 16, 2024 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jul 23, 2024

Package

No package listedSuggest a package

Affected versions

Unknown

Patched versions

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vhost: fix hung thread due to erroneous iotlb entries

In vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx(), range size can overflow to 0 when
start is 0 and last is ULONG_MAX. One instance where it can happen
is when userspace sends an IOTLB message with iova=size=uaddr=0
(vhost_process_iotlb_msg). So, an entry with size = 0, start = 0,
last = ULONG_MAX ends up in the iotlb. Next time a packet is sent,
iotlb_access_ok() loops indefinitely due to that erroneous entry.

Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 iotlb_access_ok+0x21b/0x3e0 drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1340
 vq_meta_prefetch+0xbc/0x280 drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1366
 vhost_transport_do_send_pkt+0xe0/0xfd0 drivers/vhost/vsock.c:104
 vhost_worker+0x23d/0x3d0 drivers/vhost/vhost.c:372
 kthread+0x2e9/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:377
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
 </TASK>

Reported by syzbot at:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0abd373e2e50d704db87

To fix this, do two things:

  1. Return -EINVAL in vhost_chr_write_iter() when userspace asks to map
    a range with size 0.
  2. Fix vhost_iotlb_add_range_ctx() to handle the range [0, ULONG_MAX]
    by splitting it into two entries.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 16, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 16, 2024
Last updated Jul 23, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

0.042%
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-48862

GHSA ID

GHSA-cqc3-8mfm-84p4

Source code

No known source code

Dependabot alerts are not supported on this advisory because it does not have a package from a supported ecosystem with an affected and fixed version.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.