-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Migrate the whole project from cjs to esm #137
Conversation
--- For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/afc163/fanyi?shareId=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX).
My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes! |
Walkthrough本次更改涉及将多个文件的模块语法从CommonJS转换为ES模块。主要修改包括使用 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Files selected for processing (1)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨ |
WalkthroughThis pull request migrates the entire project from CommonJS (cjs) to ECMAScript Modules (esm). Changes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to f9b9518 in 21 seconds
More details
- Looked at
280
lines of code in7
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0
drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_FEWRzohibGagEizH
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev
in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
⌛ 3 hours left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues 🎉
Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
Things to considerBased on the provided PR diff, here are the top probable issues that could be considered as bugs or missed edge cases:
It's important to note that without the full context of the application and its environment, it's challenging to determine if these are actual bugs or if there are other parts of the codebase that mitigate these concerns. Additionally, thorough testing would be required to validate the functionality and ensure that no regressions have been introduced with the migration to ESM. |
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 88cef2d in 29 seconds
More details
- Looked at
358
lines of code in6
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.mjs:6
- Draft comment:
Hardcoding API keys in the source code is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure vault to manage sensitive information like API keys. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. bin/fanyi.mjs:6
- Draft comment:
Ensure consistent import usage for 'node-fetch' across files. In 'index.mjs', it's imported as a default import, but it's not used in 'fanyi.mjs'. Consider removing unused imports. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The import statement for 'node-fetch' is inconsistent across files. In 'index.mjs', it is imported as a default import, while in 'fanyi.mjs', it is not used. This inconsistency should be addressed for clarity and maintainability.
Workflow ID: wflow_hFIaUnYQqm5qb6Hi
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
⌛ 3 hours left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
Things to consider
These potential issues should be carefully reviewed and tested to ensure that the migration from CJS to ESM does not introduce any functional or regression bugs. |
@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 2d2b733 in 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
84
lines of code in2
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. lib/searchHistory.mjs:1
- Draft comment:
ensureFileSync
is not a part of the native Node.jsfs
module. It should be imported fromfs-extra
. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment suggests thatensureFileSync
is not available in the nativefs
module, which contradicts the import statement in the diff. I need to verify ifensureFileSync
is indeed part of the nativefs
module or if it should be imported fromfs-extra
. If the comment is incorrect, it should be deleted.
I might be missing the latest updates to Node.js orfs-extra
that could have changed the availability ofensureFileSync
. It's important to verify the current state of the Node.jsfs
module to ensure the comment's accuracy.
I will verify the current Node.js documentation to confirm whetherensureFileSync
is part of the nativefs
module or not.
Verify the availability ofensureFileSync
in the native Node.jsfs
module to determine if the comment is correct. If it is not part of the native module, the comment should be kept; otherwise, it should be deleted.
Workflow ID: wflow_27OAHaH2YUpKakzj
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
⌛ 3 hours left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.
@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockb
is excluded by!**/bun.lockb
Files selected for processing (4)
- index.mjs (3 hunks)
- lib/config.mjs (3 hunks)
- lib/iciba.mjs (2 hunks)
- lib/searchHistory.mjs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- index.mjs
- lib/config.mjs
- lib/searchHistory.mjs
Additional comments not posted (1)
lib/iciba.mjs (1)
67-67
: 验证保存历史记录的函数调用请确保
saveHistory
函数的调用参数与其定义匹配,特别是means
的数据结构是否符合预期。执行以下脚本以检查
saveHistory
函数的定义和调用:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a9648f6 in 33 seconds
More details
- Looked at
41
lines of code in2
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:47
- Draft comment:
Ensure that the test script is compatible with ESM. Consider adding--experimental-vm-modules
if needed for older Node.js versions. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The test script in package.json should ensure compatibility with ESM.
Workflow ID: wflow_bzVmTqmFEVMEBYzP
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b033cbd in 30 seconds
More details
- Looked at
12
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. index.mjs:42
- Draft comment:
Consider logging the error in the catch block for debugging purposes.
console.error(error);
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The error logging line was removed in the catch block. While this might be intentional, it's generally a good practice to log errors for debugging purposes. Consider re-adding the error logging line.
Workflow ID: wflow_rsvddz0CilnXIhOx
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 5d8715f in 29 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. package.json:47
- Draft comment:
Consider documenting the reason for increasing the test timeout to 20000ms to provide context for future reference. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The test script timeout increase is a valid change, but it should be justified or documented.
Workflow ID: wflow_lVooujMYvruW9Brg
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 454aa0b in 32 seconds
More details
- Looked at
15
lines of code in1
files - Skipped
0
files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1
drafted comments based on config settings.
1. tests/index.test.ts:9
- Draft comment:
Consider including thestderr
in the rejection message for better debugging information.
reject(new Error(`Process exited with code ${code}. Stderr: ${stderr}`));
- Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The test file usespath.resolve
withfileURLToPath
to handle ESM module paths, which is correct. However, therunScript
function could be improved for better error handling and clarity.
Workflow ID: wflow_4C6pPudR20d1nTg4
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet
mode, and more.
User description
For more details, open the Copilot Workspace session.
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Migrate the entire project from CommonJS (CJS) to ECMAScript Modules (ESM).
Why are these changes being made?
The migration to ESM is being made to align with modern JavaScript standards, improve module interoperability, and take advantage of ESM's benefits such as static analysis and better tree-shaking. This change involves updating import/export syntax across the codebase and modifying the
package.json
to specify the module type.Important
Migrates the project from CommonJS to ECMAScript Modules (ESM) by renaming files, updating syntax, and modifying
package.json
..js
files to.mjs
.import
andexport
syntax across files.module.exports
toexport default
.package.json
.bin
paths inpackage.json
to use.mjs
extensions.tests/index.test.ts
to use.mjs
extension.This description was created by for 2d2b733. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Description
"type": "module"
inpackage.json
to specify the module system.Changes walkthrough
8 files
index.test.ts
Update test script paths for ESM compatibility
tests/index.test.ts
.mjs
extension andfileURLToPath
for ESMcompatibility.
output.
test.yml
Add Node.js version matrix to GitHub Actions workflow
.github/workflows/test.yml
versions.
fanyi.mjs
Migrate CLI entry point to ESM
bin/fanyi.mjs
package.json
is read usingreadFile
andURL
.index.mjs
Refactor main module to ESM
index.mjs
config.mjs
Update configuration module to ESM
lib/config.mjs
chalk
usage to be compatible with ESM.iciba.mjs
Refactor Iciba printing function to ESM
lib/iciba.mjs
printIciba
export replacing previousiciba
export.searchHistory.mjs
Update search history module to ESM
lib/searchHistory.mjs
ensureFileSync
fromutils.mjs
.utils.mjs
Add utility function for file existence check
lib/utils.mjs
ensureFileSync
to check and createfiles/directories.
1 files
package.json
Update dependencies and package configuration for ESM
package.json
.mjs
extensions."type": "module"
to specify the module system.💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.