Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 9 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ New modules

* `Data.List.Relation.Binary.Permutation.Declarative{.Properties}` for the least congruence on `List` making `_++_` commutative, and its equivalence with the `Setoid` definition.

* New module defining Naperian functors, 'logarithms of containers' (Hancock/McBride)
```
Effect.Functor.Naperian
```
defining
```agda
record RawNaperian (F : Set a → Set b) (c : Level) : Set _
record Naperian (F : Set a → Set b) (c : Level) (S : Setoid a ℓ) : Set _
```
Additions to existing modules
-----------------------------

Expand Down
23 changes: 21 additions & 2 deletions src/Data/Vec/Effectful.agda
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,14 +14,17 @@ open import Data.Vec.Base as Vec hiding (_⊛_)
open import Data.Vec.Properties
open import Effect.Applicative as App using (RawApplicative)
open import Effect.Functor as Fun using (RawFunctor)
open import Effect.Functor.Naperian as Nap using (RawNaperian; PropositionalNaperian)
open import Effect.Monad using (RawMonad; module Join; RawMonadT; mkRawMonad)
import Function.Identity.Effectful as Id
open import Function.Base using (flip; _∘_)
open import Level using (Level)
open import Level using (Level; 0ℓ)
open import Relation.Binary.Bundles using (Setoid)
open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality

private
variable
a : Level
a b : Level
A : Set a
n : ℕ

Expand All @@ -33,6 +36,22 @@ functor = record
{ _<$>_ = map
}

naperian : RawNaperian (λ (A : Set a) → Vec A n) 0ℓ
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I would name this rawNaperian and the one below naperian.

naperian {n = n} = record
{ rawFunctor = functor
; Log = Fin n
; index = lookup
; tabulate = tabulate
}

fullNaperian : PropositionalNaperian (λ (A : Set a) → Vec A n) 0ℓ
fullNaperian A = record
{ rawNaperian = naperian
; index-tabulate = λ f l → lookup∘tabulate f l
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eta contract?

; natural-tabulate = λ f k l → cong (λ fx → lookup fx l) (tabulate-∘ f k)
; natural-index = λ f as l → lookup-map l f as
}

applicative : RawApplicative (λ (A : Set a) → Vec A n)
applicative {n = n} = record
{ rawFunctor = functor
Expand Down
82 changes: 82 additions & 0 deletions src/Effect/Functor/Naperian.agda
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- The Agda standard library
--
-- Naperian functor
--
-- Definitions of Naperian Functors, as named by Hancock and McBride,
-- and subsequently documented by Jeremy Gibbons
-- in the article "APLicative Programming with Naperian Functors"
-- which appeared at ESOP 2017.
-- https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-54434-1_21
------------------------------------------------------------------------

{-# OPTIONS --cubical-compatible --safe #-}

module Effect.Functor.Naperian where

open import Effect.Functor using (RawFunctor)
open import Effect.Applicative using (RawApplicative)
open import Level using (Level; suc; _⊔_)
open import Relation.Binary.Bundles using (Setoid)
open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality.Properties as ≡ using (setoid)
open import Function.Base using (_∘_; const)

private
variable
a b c ℓ : Level
A : Set a

-- From the paper:
-- "Functor f is Naperian if there is a type p of ‘positions’ such that fa≃p→a;
-- then p behaves a little like a logarithm of f
-- in particular, if f and g are both Naperian,
-- then Log(f×g)≃Logf+Logg and Log(f.g) ≃ Log f × Log g"

-- RawNaperian contains just the functions, not the proofs
module _ (F : Set a → Set b) c where
record RawNaperian : Set (suc (a ⊔ c) ⊔ b) where
field
rawFunctor : RawFunctor F
Log : Set c
index : F A → (Log → A)
tabulate : (Log → A) → F A
open RawFunctor rawFunctor public

-- Full Naperian has the coherence conditions too.

record Naperian (S : Setoid a ℓ) : Set (suc (a ⊔ c) ⊔ b ⊔ ℓ) where
field
rawNaperian : RawNaperian
open RawNaperian rawNaperian public
open module S = Setoid S
private
FS : Setoid b (c ⊔ ℓ)
FS = record
{ _≈_ = λ (fx fy : F Carrier) → ∀ (l : Log) → index fx l ≈ index fy l
; isEquivalence = record
{ refl = λ _ → refl
; sym = λ eq l → sym (eq l)
; trans = λ i≈j j≈k l → trans (i≈j l) (j≈k l)
}
}
module FS = Setoid FS
field
index-tabulate : (f : Log → Carrier) → ((l : Log) → index (tabulate f) l ≈ f l)
natural-tabulate : (f : Carrier → Carrier) (k : Log → Carrier) → (tabulate (f ∘ k)) FS.≈ (f <$> (tabulate k))
natural-index : (f : Carrier → Carrier) (as : F Carrier) (l : Log) → (index (f <$> as) l) ≈ f (index as l)
Comment on lines +65 to +66
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!
Can natural-tabulate also be eliminated by defining it in terms of index-tabulate, natural-index, and tabulate-index?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it can without assuming congruence on the setoid. I was trying to do so, but I was stuck and needed to prove the function congruence on the setoid S. I could figure out that

natural-index f (tabulate k) l -> index (f <$> tabulate k) l ≈ f (index (tabulate k) l)
index-tabulate k l                    -> index (tabulate k) l ≈ k l
index-tabulate (f ∘ k) l            -> index (tabulate (λ x  f (k x))) l ≈ f (k l)

If I assume congruence, then I could prove tabulate-index.

I don't think we can find a proof for tabulate-index without congruence, but I am not sure. I base my argument on the fact that tabulate-∘ needs cong to be proved.


tabulate-index : (fx : F Carrier) → tabulate (index fx) FS.≈ fx
tabulate-index = index-tabulate ∘ index

PropositionalNaperian : Set (suc (a ⊔ c) ⊔ b)
PropositionalNaperian = ∀ A → Naperian (≡.setoid A)

Naperian-Applicative : RawNaperian → RawApplicative F
Naperian-Applicative rn =
record
{ rawFunctor = rawFunctor
; pure = tabulate ∘ const
; _<*>_ = λ a b → tabulate (λ i → (index a i) (index b i))
}
where
open RawNaperian rn