feat: Adding support for Groq API, Cerebras SDK, compatibility to have much higher response #54
+149
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
noahvandal
changed the title
noahvandal
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added support for the Groq API and the Cerebras SDK, to enable a much higher throughput of RLM inference.
I did note that the gpt-oss series models did not perform that well, as there were errors on the manner in which it was trying to call tools, instead of using the REPL. The other models such as
llama-3.3-70b-versatile, et. al., performed fine.{NOTE}: trying out the gpt-oss on Cerebras worked just fine; this seems to be a Groq issue.