-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Continuous output from remote functions #39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
psukys
wants to merge
3
commits into
alfredodeza:master
Choose a base branch
from
psukys:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not straightforward - there needs to be a finalizer and I have doubts about it being on remoto side (rather than remote function explicitly finalizing)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn't it possible to raise an exception here instead of just getting a None?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not aware (and experienced) with pickling capabilities in this end. What I thought could be an alternative is having some side-channel or trigger that gives us end-of-stream (since we might want to reuse the channel for further communication and so on)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would basically mean that no function would be allowed to not return anything (which implicitly returns a
None) or explicitly return aNoneunless it wants to really close the channel.I don't have a use case for this explicitly, but I would prefer an exception. There is no need to pickle anything here though, as you can see the exception is being handled in the next few lines and we are able to poke inside. Something like
EOFError('close')would be enough for us to check this?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for being inactive for quite a while. I saw that there's
util.RemoteError, what is its relation toexecnet.RemoteErrorfunctionality?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the naming is unfortunate, but it is just a helper to try to detect the remote exception name. There is no relation to execent.RemoteError
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I'm not sure regarding
EOFErrorfrom guest side. Having something like this:returns me a
DumpErrorasEOFErroris not serializable, while:finishes silently (not caught by
execnet?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I knew this wouldn't be straightforward :( If
EOFErroris not serializable, I would try with other exceptions. Basically, to find a way where the connection is able to detect there is nothing else coming in, in a non-generic way (e.g. implicitNonecan't be used).