Skip to content

[ALP-580] Add mention to Alpic CLI in skills#440

Open
harijoe wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
julien/alp-580-skills-add-alpic-cli-mention-and-usage-in-the-chatgpt-and
Open

[ALP-580] Add mention to Alpic CLI in skills#440
harijoe wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
julien/alp-580-skills-add-alpic-cli-mention-and-usage-in-the-chatgpt-and

Conversation

@harijoe
Copy link
Collaborator

@harijoe harijoe commented Feb 5, 2026

This PR updates deployment instructions across multiple skills documentation.

  • Enhances deployment notes by specifying usage of the Alpic CLI for command-line deployment and the choices available in the dashboard for GitHub-based deployment.
  • Clarifies the deployment process for Alpic, including API key setup and project linking via the CLI.
  • Standardizes the deployment instructions across chatgpt-app-builder, mcp-app-builder, and skybridge skills documentation.

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

Enhanced deployment documentation across three skills (chatgpt-app-builder, mcp-app-builder, and skybridge) by adding Alpic CLI deployment instructions alongside the existing dashboard-based GitHub deployment method.

Key changes:

  • Added Option A (CLI deployment) with instructions for API key setup, environment configuration, and project linking via .alpic/project.json
  • Reorganized existing dashboard deployment instructions as Option B
  • Standardized deployment instructions across all three SKILL.md files with inline CLI command reference
  • Maintained consistency in formatting and structure across all documentation files

The changes are documentation-only and provide developers with clearer deployment options without modifying any functional code.

Confidence Score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with no risk
  • Documentation-only changes that enhance clarity and provide additional deployment options without affecting any functional code or introducing breaking changes
  • No files require special attention

@harijoe harijoe requested a review from paulleseute February 5, 2026 14:32
@harijoe harijoe marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2026 14:32
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No files reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Contributor

@paulleseute paulleseute left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should have a unique path for deployment. From what I understand users have to go log on Alpic in both cases, so we should choose wether we want them to link a repo or upload the code.

## Deploy

- **Ship to production** → [deploy.md](references/deploy.md): when ready to deploy via Alpic
- **Ship to production** → [deploy.md](references/deploy.md): when ready to deploy via Alpic. Use the **Alpic CLI** (`npx alpic deploy`) for CLI-based deploy, or the dashboard for GitHub-based deploy.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should not mention the CLI now because it lower the chances of the LLM to read the actual deploy doc.

Comment on lines +3 to +7
**Option A — Alpic CLI:** Get an API key from **Team settings** in the [Alpic dashboard](https://app.alpic.ai), set `ALPIC_API_KEY` in the environment, then run `npx alpic deploy` from the project root (or `npx alpic deploy ./path`). On first run the CLI will prompt to create a new project or link to an existing one; the choice is saved in `.alpic/project.json` for future deploys.

Guide user through these steps:
**Option B — Dashboard (GitHub):** Push code to a GitHub repo, then deploy via Alpic.

Guide user through these steps for the dashboard flow:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to distinct which steps should be done by the user, and which one are to be run by the LLM. Also the deploy instructions are likely for first time user, I wonder if having 2 paths is not bringing confusion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments