Skip to content

Conversation

@crepererum
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

See #385 and #405.

Rationale for this change

get is just get_opts with default options.

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. move method to extension trait
  2. remove no-longer-required implementations

Are there any user-facing changes?

Breaking: get moved from ObjectStore to ObjectStoreExt.

@crepererum crepererum force-pushed the crepererum/os-ext-get branch 2 times, most recently from bc30624 to f5fe13a Compare November 6, 2025 13:50
@crepererum crepererum changed the title refactor: move get to ObjectStoreExt (#530) refactor: move get to ObjectStoreExt Nov 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@kylebarron kylebarron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a note on the conventional commit title (if we're trying to follow conventional commits?): since this is a breaking change I'd make the prefix refactor!: description

@crepererum crepererum changed the title refactor: move get to ObjectStoreExt refactor!: move get to ObjectStoreExt Nov 6, 2025
@crepererum crepererum force-pushed the crepererum/os-ext-get branch from f5fe13a to 8a27427 Compare November 6, 2025 14:11
@crepererum crepererum marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2025 14:11
@crepererum
Copy link
Contributor Author

if we're trying to follow conventional commits?)

I don't know if we do. This is mostly my personal habit, but you're rightfully pointing out the missing "breaking" marker.

@crepererum crepererum merged commit 95b0a94 into apache:main Nov 6, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants