MINOR: [CI][Docs][R] fix R dev docs#37595
Merged
assignUser merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Sep 6, 2023
Merged
Conversation
assignUser
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2023
Member
assignUser
left a comment
assignUser
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great, thanks for taking care of this!
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting committer review
Co-authored-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
assignUser
changed the title
Member
|
Oh, sorry. Thanks! |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 7f604b2. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
loicalleyne
pushed a commit
to loicalleyne/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2023
### Rationale for this change This fixes this failing build: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/actions/runs/5745111541/job/15572612431#step:9:27 ### What changes are included in this PR? That job is now called `test-ubuntu-22.04-docs` and started running the day after `test-ubuntu-default-docs` stopped running. I wasn't sure if it was possible (or worth it) to extend the task template into the ruby file so I just opted for a code comment for future changes. ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? dev docs will build again Lead-authored-by: Sam Albers <sam.albers@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de> Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
### Rationale for this change This fixes this failing build: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/actions/runs/5745111541/job/15572612431#step:9:27 ### What changes are included in this PR? That job is now called `test-ubuntu-22.04-docs` and started running the day after `test-ubuntu-default-docs` stopped running. I wasn't sure if it was possible (or worth it) to extend the task template into the ruby file so I just opted for a code comment for future changes. ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? dev docs will build again Lead-authored-by: Sam Albers <sam.albers@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de> Signed-off-by: Jacob Wujciak-Jens <jacob@wujciak.de>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
This fixes this failing build: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/actions/runs/5745111541/job/15572612431#step:9:27
What changes are included in this PR?
That job is now called
test-ubuntu-22.04-docsand started running the day aftertest-ubuntu-default-docsstopped running. I wasn't sure if it was possible (or worth it) to extend the task template into the ruby file so I just opted for a code comment for future changes.Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?
dev docs will build again