Skip to content

GH-49737: [R][CI] Disable Rhub GCC 12 and GCC 13 with LTO jobs - images no longer match CRAN#49739

Merged
thisisnic merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
thisisnic:GH-49737-disable-gcc-13
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

GH-49737: [R][CI] Disable Rhub GCC 12 and GCC 13 with LTO jobs - images no longer match CRAN#49739
thisisnic merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
thisisnic:GH-49737-disable-gcc-13

Conversation

@thisisnic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@thisisnic thisisnic commented Apr 14, 2026

Rationale for this change

Disable failing + out of date CI jobs until we have a container with GCC 15 to replace them

What changes are included in this PR?

Disable them - leave commented out as we'll replace later

Are these changes tested?

No

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Apr 14, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rhub GCC 13 with LTO has been failing on CI for several weeks but Rhub GCC 12 seems to be successful. Example for last nightly:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/24381689114/job/71206402529

Should we still remove that one too?

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting changes Awaiting changes and removed awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review labels Apr 14, 2026
@thisisnic
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

thisisnic commented Apr 14, 2026

Rhub GCC 13 with LTO has been failing on CI for several weeks but Rhub GCC 12 seems to be successful. Example for last nightly: https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/24381689114/job/71206402529

Should we still remove that one too?

I think so - my reasoning was that the job's purpose is to track CRAN builds, but they no longer run on GCC12 anyway, and when we do follow-up ticket #49738 (which should be unblocked soon) we'll have the GCC15 jobs we need

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@raulcd raulcd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, then temporarily disabling both builds sounds good to me! Thanks @thisisnic

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting merge Awaiting merge and removed awaiting changes Awaiting changes labels Apr 14, 2026
@thisisnic thisisnic merged commit 0fb2c8e into apache:main Apr 14, 2026
17 checks passed
@thisisnic thisisnic removed the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Apr 14, 2026
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link
Copy Markdown

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 0fb2c8e.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants